Development of a computerised decision aid for thrombolysis in acute stroke care

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Research Article

Helen Rodgers¹  Gary A Ford¹  Christian Kray²  Darren Flynn³  Richard G Thomson³  Peter McMeekin³  Daniel J Nesbitt⁴  Christopher Price⁵ 

[1] Institute for Ageing and Health (Stroke Research Group), Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK;Institute for Geoinformatics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany;Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK;School of Computing, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK;Wansbeck General Hospital, Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Ashington, UK;

关键词: Decision support;    Decision aid;    Patient information;    Shared decision making;    Risk communication;    Thrombolysis;    Acute stroke;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12911-014-0127-1

 received in 2014-08-07, accepted in 2014-12-22,  发布年份 2015

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundThrombolytic treatment for acute ischaemic stroke improves prognosis, although there is a risk of bleeding complications leading to early death/severe disability. Benefit from thrombolysis is time dependent and treatment must be administered within 4.5 hours from onset of symptoms, which presents unique challenges for development of tools to support decision making and patient understanding about treatment. Our aim was to develop a decision aid to support patient-specific clinical decision-making about thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke, and clinical communication of personalised information on benefits/risks of thrombolysis by clinicians to patients/relatives.MethodsUsing mixed methods we developed a COMPuterised decision Aid for Stroke thrombolysiS (COMPASS) in an iterative staged process (review of available tools; a decision analytic model; interactive group workshops with clinicians and patients/relatives; and prototype usability testing). We then tested the tool in simulated situations with final testing in real life stroke thrombolysis decisions in hospitals. Clinicians used COMPASS pragmatically in managing acute stroke patients potentially eligible for thrombolysis; their experience was assessed using self-completion forms and interviews. Computer logged data assessed time in use, and utilisation of graphical risk presentations and additional features. Patients’/relatives’ experiences of discussions supported by COMPASS were explored using interviews.ResultsCOMPASS expresses predicted outcomes (bleeding complications, death, and extent of disability) with and without thrombolysis, presented numerically (percentages and natural frequencies) and graphically (pictographs, bar graphs and flowcharts). COMPASS was used for 25 patients and no adverse effects of use were reported. Median time in use was 2.8 minutes. Graphical risk presentations were shared with 14 patients/relatives. Clinicians (n = 10) valued the patient-specific predictions of benefit from thrombolysis, and the support of better risk communication with patients/relatives. Patients (n = 2) and relatives (n = 6) reported that graphical risk presentations facilitated understanding of benefits/risks of thrombolysis. Additional features (e.g. dosage calculator) were suggested and subsequently embedded within COMPASS to enhance usability.ConclusionsOur structured development process led to the development of a gamma prototype computerised decision aid. Initial evaluation has demonstrated reasonable acceptability of COMPASS amongst patients, relatives and clinicians. The impact of COMPASS on clinical outcomes requires wider prospective evaluation in clinical settings.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Flynn et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015