期刊论文详细信息
BMC Infectious Diseases
A needs assessment study for optimising prescribing practice in secondary care junior doctors: the Antibiotic Prescribing Education among Doctors (APED)
Research Article
Lydia N. Drumright1  Myriam Gharbi2  Enrique Castro-Sánchez2  Luke S. P. Moore3  Alison H. Holmes3  Charlotte Grady4  Elpiniki Spanoudaki4 
[1] NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance at Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, W12 0HS, London, UK;Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, Cambridge, UK;NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance at Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, W12 0HS, London, UK;National Centre for Infection Prevention and Management, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, W12 0HS, London, UK;NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance at Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, W12 0HS, London, UK;National Centre for Infection Prevention and Management, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, W12 0HS, London, UK;Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, W12 0NN, London, UK;National Centre for Infection Prevention and Management, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, W12 0HS, London, UK;
关键词: Antimicrobials;    Continuing medical education;    Clinical education;    Knowledge;    Behaviour;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12879-016-1800-z
 received in 2016-01-25, accepted in 2016-08-23,  发布年份 2016
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundAppropriate antimicrobial prescribing is essential for patient care, yet up to half of antimicrobial prescriptions written in the UK are sub-optimal. Improving prescriber education has recently been promoted as a mechanism to optimise antimicrobial use, but identification of key learning objectives to facilitate this is so far lacking. Using qualitative methods we investigated junior doctor knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours around antimicrobial prescribing to identify key areas to address in future educational programmes.MethodsA cross-sectional survey of qualified doctors in training in West London was undertaken exploring antimicrobial prescribing practices and educational needs.ResultsAmong 140 junior doctors from 5 London hospitals, a third (34 %) reported prescribing primarily unsupervised, and two thirds (67 %) reported difficulties obtaining prescribing support outside of hours. 20 % stated not feeling confident in writing an antimicrobial prescription, but confidence was increased through having confirmatory diagnostic results (24) and obtaining advice from a senior doctor (26 %); whether this senior was from their own specialty, or an infection-specialist, varied significantly (p < 0.01) by experience. Only a small percentage (5–13 %; depending on number of years post-qualification) of participants stated their previous antimicrobial education was effective. 60 % of those in their first year post qualification reported wanting further education in antimicrobial prescribing, rising to 74 % among more experienced junior doctors. Specific areas of educational need identified were (i) principles of antimicrobial prescribing, (ii) diagnosis of infections, (iii) clinical review of patients with infections, (iv) prescribing in the context of antimicrobial resistance, and (v) laboratory testing and test results.ConclusionsA significant proportion of junior doctors report lone prescribing of antimicrobials in the context of low self-perceived confidence and knowledge in this field, and frequent difficulty in accessing help when necessary. Innovative training, targeting five specific areas identified through this needs assessment, is urgently needed by junior doctors practising in secondary care.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s). 2016

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202311098966802ZK.pdf 813KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:2次 浏览次数:1次