Results of a pilot randomised controlled trial to measure the clinical and cost effectiveness of peer support in increasing hope and quality of life in mental health patients discharged from hospital in the UK

BMC Psychiatry

Research Article

Susan Henry¹  Paul Sherman¹  Richard Evans¹  Cerdic Hall¹  Len Bowers²  Julie Rowe³  Chris Flood⁴  Alan Simpson⁴  Jody Quigley⁵ 

[1] East London NHS Foundation Trust, 22 Commercial Street, E1 6LPUK, London, UK;Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College, SE5 8AF, London, UK;KentHealth, Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, CT2 7NF, Canterbury, Kent, UK;School of Health Sciences, City University London, Northampton Square, EC1V 0HB, London, UK;School of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Graham Hills Building, 40 George Street, G1 1QE, Glasgow, UK;

关键词: Peer support;    Mental health;    Discharge;    Hope;    Loneliness;    Quality of life;    Economic evaluation;    Suicide;   

DOI  :  10.1186/1471-244X-14-30

 received in 2013-10-03, accepted in 2014-02-03,  发布年份 2014

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundMental health patients can feel anxious about losing the support of staff and patients when discharged from hospital and often discontinue treatment, experience relapse and readmission to hospital, and sometimes attempt suicide. The benefits of peer support in mental health services have been identified in a number of studies with some suggesting clinical and economic gains in patients being discharged.MethodsThis pilot randomised controlled trial with economic evaluation aimed to explore whether peer support in addition to usual aftercare for patients during the transition from hospital to home would increase hope, reduce loneliness, improve quality of life and show cost effectiveness compared with patients receiving usual aftercare only, with follow-up at one and three-months post-discharge.ResultsA total of 46 service users were recruited to the study; 23 receiving peer support and 23 in the care-as-usual arm. While this pilot trial found no statistically significant benefits for peer support on the primary or secondary outcome measures, there is an indication that hope may be further increased in those in receipt of peer support. The total cost per case for the peer support arm of the study was £2154 compared to £1922 for the control arm. The mean difference between costs was minimal and not statistically significant. However, further analyses demonstrated that peer support has a reasonably high probability of being more cost effective for a modest positive change in the measure of hopelessness. Challenges faced in recruitment and follow-up are explored alongside limitations in the delivery of peer support.ConclusionsThe findings suggest there is merit in conducting further research on peer support in the transition from hospital to home consideration should be applied to the nature of the patient population to whom support is offered; the length and frequency of support provided; and the contact between peer supporters and mental health staff. There is no conclusive evidence to support the cost effectiveness of providing peer support, but neither was it proven a costly intervention to deliver. The findings support an argument for a larger scale trial of peer support as an adjunct to existing services.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN74852771

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Simpson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014