Using a hypothetical scenario to assess public preferences for colorectal surveillance following screening-detected, intermediate-risk adenomas: annual home-based stool test vs. triennial colonoscopy

BMC Gastroenterology

Research Article

Wendy Atkin¹  Eilidh MacRae¹  Harriet L. Bowyer²  Alex Ghanouni²  Christian von Wagner²  Bernardette Bonello²  Jane Wardle²  Stephen P. Halloran³ 

[1] Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK;Health Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, WC1E 7HB, London, UK;NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Southern Programme Hub, Guildford, Surrey, UK;Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust & University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK;

关键词: Cancer surveillance;    Faecal immunochemical test;    Colonoscopy;    Colorectal cancer;    Patient preference;    Intermediate-risk adenomas;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12876-016-0517-1

 received in 2016-01-11, accepted in 2016-08-11,  发布年份 2016

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundTo assess public preferences for colorectal cancer (CRC) surveillance tests for intermediate-risk adenomas, using a hypothetical scenario.MethodsAdults aged 45–54 years without CRC were identified from three General Practices in England (two in Cumbria, one in London). A postal survey was carried out during a separate study on preferences for different first-line CRC screening modalities (non- or full-laxative computed tomographic colonography, flexible sigmoidoscopy, or colonoscopy). Individuals were allocated at random to receive a pack containing information on one first-line test, and a paragraph describing CRC surveillance recommendations for people who are diagnosed with intermediate-risk adenomas during screening. All participants received a description of two surveillance options: annual single-sample, home-based stool testing (consistent with Faecal Immunochemical Tests; FIT) or triennial colonoscopy. Invitees were asked to imagine they had been diagnosed with intermediate-risk adenomas, and then complete a questionnaire on their surveillance preferences.Results22.1 % (686/3,100) questionnaires were returned. 491 (15.8 %) were eligible for analysis. The majority of participants stated a surveillance preference for the stool test over colonoscopy (60.8 % vs 31.0 %; no preference: 8.1 %; no surveillance: 0.2 %). Women were more likely to prefer the stool test than men (66.7 % vs. 53.6 %; p = .011). The primary reason for preferring the stool test was that it would be done more frequently. The main reason to prefer colonoscopy was its superiority at finding polyps.ConclusionsA majority of participants stated a preference for a surveillance test resembling FIT over colonoscopy. Future research should test whether this translates to greater adherence in a real surveillance setting.Trial registrationInternational Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number registry, ISRCTN85697880, prospectively registered on 25/04/2013

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s). 2016