Practical based approach to left main bifurcation stenting

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders

Review

Jung-Min Ahn¹  Seung-Jung Park¹  Pil Hyung Lee¹ 

[1] Department of Cardiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 388-1 Poongnap-dong, 138-736, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Korea;

关键词: Left main coronary artery;    Percutaneous coronary intervention;    Bifurcation;    Intravascular ultrasound;    Fractional flow reserve;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12872-016-0227-1

 received in 2016-02-04, accepted in 2016-02-12,  发布年份 2016

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

Despite the recent developments that have been made in the field of percutaneous left main (LM) intervention, the treatment of distal LM bifurcation remains challenging. The provisional one-stent approach for LM bifurcation has shown more favorable outcomes than the two-stent technique, making the former the preferred strategy in most types of LM bifurcation stenosis. However, elective two-stent techniques, none of which has been proven superior to the others, are still used in patients with severely diseased large side branches to avoid acute hemodynamic compromise. Selecting the proper bifurcation treatment strategy using meticulous intravascular ultrasound evaluation for side branch ostium is crucial for reducing the risk of side branch occlusion and for improving patient outcomes. In addition, unnecessary complex intervention can be avoided by measuring fractional flow reserve in angiographically isolated side branches. Most importantly, good long-term clinical outcomes are more related to the successful procedure itself than to the type of stenting technique, emphasizing the greater importance of optimizing the chosen technique than the choice of method.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Ahn et al. 2016