Typologies in GPs’ referral practice

BMC Family Practice

Research Article

Jan Olav Johannessen¹  Anders Bærheim²  Geir Egil Eide³  Olav Thorsen⁴  Miriam Hartveit⁵  Lars Fosse⁶  Jörn Schulz⁷ 

[1] Centre for Clinical Psychosis Research, Division of Psychiatry, Stavanger University Hospital, Box 8100, N-4068, Stavanger, Norway;Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stavanger, Box 8100, N-4068, Stavanger, Norway;Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Box 7800, N-5020, Bergen, Norway;Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Box 7800, N-5020, Bergen, Norway;Centre for Clinical Research, Haukeland University Hospital, Box 1400, N-5021, Bergen, Norway;Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Box 7800, N-5020, Bergen, Norway;Department of Research, Stavanger University Hospital, Box 8100, N-4068, Stavanger, Norway;Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Box 7800, N-5020, Bergen, Norway;Section for Research and Innovation, Helse Fonna HF, Box 2170, N-5504, Haugesund, Norway;Department of Orthopaedics, Stavanger University Hospital, Box 8100, N-4068, Stavanger, Norway;Department of Research, Stavanger University Hospital, Box 8100, N-4068, Stavanger, Norway;Section of Biostatistics, Stavanger University Hospital, Box 8100, N-4068, Stavanger, Norway;

关键词: Referral process;    Typologies;    Confidence;    Uncertainty;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12875-016-0495-y

 received in 2016-02-23, accepted in 2016-07-13,  发布年份 2016

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundGPs’ individual decisions to refer and the various ways of working when they refer are important determinants of secondary care use. The objective of this study was to explore and describe potential characteristics of GPs’ referral practice by investigating their opinions about referring and their self-reported experiences of what they do when they refer.MethodsObservational cross-sectional study using data from 128 Norwegian GPs who filled in a questionnaire with statements on how they regarded the referral process, and who were invited to collect data when they actually referred to hospital during one month. Only elective referrals were recorded. The 57 participants (44,5%) recorded data from 691 referrals. The variables were included in a principal component analysis. A multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to identify typologies with GP’s age, gender, specialty in family medicine and location as independent variables.ResultsEight principal components describe the different ways GPs think and work when they refer. Two typologies summarize these components: confidence characterizing specialists in family medicine, mainly female, who reported a more patient-centred practice making priority decisions when they refer, who confer easily with hospital consultants and who complete the referrals during the consultation; uncertainty characterizing young, mainly male non-specialists in family medicine, experiencing patients’ pressure to be referred, heavy workload, having reluctance to cooperate with the patient and reporting sparse contact with hospital colleagues.ConclusionsTraining specialists in family medicine in patient-centred method, easy conference with hospital consultant and cooperation with patients while making the referral may foster both self-reflections on own competences and increased levels of confidence.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s). 2016