| BMC Endocrine Disorders | |
| Predictive value of serum testosterone for type 2 diabetes risk assessment in men | |
| Research Article | |
| Peter O’Loughlin1  Anne W. Taylor2  Zumin Shi2  Robert J. Adams3  Gary Wittert3  Sean Martin4  Evan Atlantis5  Paul Fahey6  | |
| [1] Chemical Pathology, SA Pathology, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia;Population Research and Outcome Studies, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia;School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia;School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia;Freemasons Foundation Centre for Men’s Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia;School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia;School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia;School of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia; | |
| 关键词: Testosterone; Diabetes; Incidence; Screening; Prognosis; ROC; Cohort; | |
| DOI : 10.1186/s12902-016-0109-7 | |
| received in 2016-01-12, accepted in 2016-05-17, 发布年份 2016 | |
| 来源: Springer | |
PDF
|
|
【 摘 要 】
BackgroundEffective prevention of type 2 diabetes (T2D) requires early identification of high-risk individuals who might benefit from intervention. We sought to determine whether low serum testosterone, a novel risk factor for T2D in men, adds clinically meaningful information beyond current T2D risk models.MethodsThe Men Androgen Inflammation Lifestyle Environment and Stress (MAILES) study population consists of 2563 community-dwelling men aged 35–80 years in Adelaide, Australia. Of the MAILES participants, 2038 (80.0 %) provided information at baseline (2002–2006) and follow-up (2007–2010). After excluding participants with diabetes (n = 317), underweight (n = 5), and unknown BMI status (n = 11) at baseline; and unknown diabetes status (n = 50) at follow-up; 1655 participants were followed for 5 years. T2D at baseline and follow-up was defined by self-reported diabetes, or fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥7.0 mmol/L (126.1 mg/dL), or glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥6.5 %, or diabetes medications. Risk models were tested using logistic regression models. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV) were used to identify the optimal cut-off point for low serum testosterone for incident T2D and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AROC) curve was used to summarise the predictive power of the model. 15.5 % of men had at least one missing predictor variable; addressed through multiple imputation.ResultsThe incidence rate of T2D was 8.9 % (147/1655) over a median follow-up of 4.95 years (interquartile range: 4.35-5.00). Serum testosterone level predicted incident T2D (relative risk 0.96 [95 % CI: 0.92,1.00], P = 0.032) independent of current risk models including the AUSDRISK, but did not improve corresponding AROC statistics. A cut-off point of <16 nmol/L for low serum testosterone, which classified about 43 % of men, returned equal sensitivity (61.3 % [95 % CI: 52.6,69.4]) and specificity (58.3 % [95 % CI: 55.6,60.9) for predicting T2D risk, with a PPV of 12.9 % (95 % CI: 10.4,15.8).ConclusionsLow serum testosterone predicts an increased risk of developing T2D in men over 5 years independent of current T2D risk models applicable for use in routine clinical practice. Screening for low serum testosterone in addition to risk factors from current T2D risk assessment models or tools, including the AUSDRISK, would identify a large subgroup of distinct men who might benefit from targeted preventive interventions.
【 授权许可】
CC BY
© The Author(s). 2016
【 预 览 】
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
| RO202311097314106ZK.pdf | 507KB |
【 参考文献 】
- [1]
- [2]
- [3]
- [4]
- [5]
- [6]
- [7]
- [8]
- [9]
- [10]
- [11]
- [12]
- [13]
- [14]
- [15]
- [16]
- [17]
- [18]
- [19]
- [20]
- [21]
- [22]
- [23]
- [24]
- [25]
- [26]
- [27]
- [28]
- [29]
- [30]
- [31]
- [32]
- [33]
- [34]
- [35]
- [36]
- [37]
- [38]
- [39]
- [40]
- [41]
- [42]
- [43]
- [44]
- [45]
- [46]
- [47]
- [48]
- [49]
- [50]
- [51]
- [52]
- [53]
- [54]
- [55]
- [56]
- [57]
- [58]
- [59]
PDF