Acceptability of tick control interventions to prevent Lyme disease in Switzerland and Canada: a mixed-method study

BMC Public Health

Research Article

André Ravel¹  Jean-Philippe Waaub²  François Milord³  Lise Gern⁴  Denise Bélanger⁵  Cécile Aenishaenslin⁵  Pascal Michel⁶ 

[1] Département de pathologie et microbiologie, Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, CP 5000, Saint-Hyacinthe, J2S 7C6, Québec, Canada;Group for Research in Decision Analysis (GERAD), 3000 Côte-Sainte-Catherine, H3T 2A7, Montréal, Québec, Canada;Institut national de santé publique du Québec, 1255 Beauregard, Longueuil, J4K 2M3, Québec, Canada;Laboratoire d’Eco-Épidémiologie, Institut de Biologie, Université de Neuchâtel, 11 Émile-Argand, CP 158, 2009, Neuchâtel, Switzerland;Research Group on Epidemiology of Zoonoses and Public Health, Pavillon de la santé publique, Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, CP 5000, Saint-Hyacinthe, J2S 7C6, Québec, Canada;Département de pathologie et microbiologie, Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, CP 5000, Saint-Hyacinthe, J2S 7C6, Québec, Canada;Research Group on Epidemiology of Zoonoses and Public Health, Pavillon de la santé publique, Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, CP 5000, Saint-Hyacinthe, J2S 7C6, Québec, Canada;Laboratory for Foodborne Zoonoses, Public Health Agency of Canada, CP 5000, Saint-Hyacinthe, H2S 7C6, Québec, Canada;

关键词: Tick control;    Lyme disease;    Borreliosis;    Prevention;    Acceptability;    Risk perception;    Mixed-methods;    Intervention acceptability;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12889-015-2629-x

 received in 2015-10-01, accepted in 2015-12-16,  发布年份 2016

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundLyme disease control strategies may include tick control interventions in high risk areas. Public authorities may be interested to assess how these types of interventions are perceived by the public which may then impact their acceptability. The aims of this paper are to compare socio-cognitive factors associated with high acceptability of tick control interventions and to describe perceived issues that may explain their low acceptability in populations living in two different regions, one being an endemic region for LD since the last 30 years, the Neuchâtel canton, in Switzerland, and another where the disease is emerging, the Montérégie region, in Canada.MethodsA mixed methods’ design was chosen. Quantitative data were collected using web-surveys conducted in both regions (n = 814). Multivariable logistic regressions were used to compare socio-cognitive factors associated with high acceptability of selected interventions. Qualitative data were collected using focus group’s discussions to describe perceived issues relative to these interventions.ResultsLevels of acceptability in the studied populations were the lowest for the use of acaricides and landscaping and were under 50 % in both regions for six out of eight interventions, but were higher overall in Montérégie. High perceived efficacy of the intervention was strongly associated with high acceptability of tick control interventions. A high perceived risk about LD was also associated with a high acceptability of intervention under some models. High level of knowledge about LD was negatively associated with high acceptability of the use of acaricides in Neuchâtel. Perceived issues explaining low acceptability included environmental impacts, high costs to the public system, danger of individual disempowerment and perceptions that tick control interventions were disproportionate options for the level of LD risk.ConclusionThis study suggests that the perceived efficacy and LD risk perception may be key factors to target to increase the acceptability of tick control interventions. Community-level issues seem to be important considerations driving low acceptability of public health interventions. Results of this study highlight the importance for decision-makers to account for socio-cognitive factors and perceived issues that may affect the acceptability of public health interventions in order to maximize the efficacy of actions to prevent and control LD.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Aenishaenslin et al. 2015