Digital imaging in the immunohistochemical evaluation of the proliferation markers Ki67, MCM2 and Geminin, in early breast cancer, and their putative prognostic value

BMC Cancer

Research Article

John P. Brown¹  Patrycja Gazinska²  Johnathan Watkins²  Anita Grigoriadis²  Shalaka Joshi³  Sarah E. Pinder⁴  Cheryl E. Gillett⁴ 

[1] Department of Research Oncology, King’s College London, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, Division of Cancer Studies, Bermondsey Wing, Guy’s Hospital, London, UK;Department of Research Oncology, King’s College London, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, Division of Cancer Studies, Bermondsey Wing, Guy’s Hospital, London, UK;Breast Cancer Now Unit, King’s College London, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, Division of Cancer Studies, Bermondsey Wing, Guy’s Hospital, London, UK;Department of Research Oncology, King’s College London, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, Division of Cancer Studies, Bermondsey Wing, Guy’s Hospital, London, UK;Breast Cancer Now Unit, King’s College London, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, Division of Cancer Studies, Bermondsey Wing, Guy’s Hospital, London, UK;Present address: Tata Memorial Centre, Dr E Borges Road, Parel, 400012, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India;Department of Research Oncology, King’s College London, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, Division of Cancer Studies, Bermondsey Wing, Guy’s Hospital, London, UK;King’s Health Partners Cancer Biobank, King’s College London, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, Division of Cancer Studies, Bermondsey Wing, Guy’s Hospital, London, UK;

关键词: Ki67;    MCM2;    Geminin;    Proliferation;    Digital microscopy;    Immunohistochemistry;    Survival analysis;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12885-015-1531-3

 received in 2015-01-02, accepted in 2015-07-02,  发布年份 2015

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundImmunohistochemical assessment of proliferation may provide additional prognostic information in early breast cancer. However, due to a lack of methodological standards proliferation markers are still not routinely used for determining therapy. Even for Ki67, one of the most widely-studied markers, disagreements over the optimal cutoff exist. Improvements in digital microscopy may provide new avenues to standardise and make data more reproducible.MethodsWe studied the immunohistochemical expression of three markers of proliferation: Ki67, Mini-Chromosome Maintenance protein 2 and Geminin, by conventional light microscope and digital imaging on triplicate TMAs from 309 consecutive cases of primary breast cancers. Differences between the average and the maximum percentage reactivity in tumour cell nuclei from the three TMA cores were investigated to assess the validity of the approach. Time-dependent Receiver Operating Characteristic curves were utilized to obtain optimal expression level cut-offs, which were then correlated with clinico-pathological features and survival.ResultsHigh concordance between conventional and digital scores was observed for all 3 markers (Ki67: rs = 0.87, P < 0.001; MCM2: rs = 0.94, P < 0.001; and Geminin: rs = 0.86, P < 0.001; Spearman’s rank). There was no significant difference according to the number of TMA cores included for either Ki67 or MCM2; analysis of two or three cores produced comparable results. Higher levels of all three proliferation markers were significantly associated with higher grade (P < 0.001) and ER-negativity (P < 0.001). Optimal prognostic cut-offs for percentage expression in the tumour were 8 %, 12 and 2.33 % for Ki67, MCM2 and Geminin respectively. All 3 proliferation marker cutoffs were predictive of 15-year breast cancer-specific survival in univariable Cox regression analyses. In multivariable analysis only lymph node status (HR = 3.9, 95 % CI = 1.79-8.5, P = 0.0006) and histological grade (HR = 1.84, 95 % CI = 1–3.38, P = 0.05) remained significantly prognostic.ConclusionsHere we show that. MCM2 is a more sensitive marker of proliferation than Ki67 and should be examined in future studies, especially in the lymph node-negative, hormone receptor-positive subgroup. Further, digital microscopy can be used effectively as a high-throughput method to evaluate immunohistochemical expression.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Joshi et al. 2015