Intervention development for integration of conventional tobacco cessation interventions into routine CAM practice

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Research Article

Cheryl K Ritenbaugh¹  Myra L Muramoto¹  Eva Matthews¹  Mark A Nichter² 

[1] Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine, P.O. Box 245052, 85724, Tucson, AZ, USA;University of Arizona, School of Anthropology, 1009 E. South Campus Drive, 85721, Tucson, AZ, USA;

关键词: Context validity;    Intervention protocol;    Curriculum development;    Training;    Interprofessional education;    Tobacco cessation;    Chiropractic;    Acupuncture;    Massage therapist;    Community based participatory research;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12906-015-0604-9

 received in 2014-04-07, accepted in 2015-03-10,  发布年份 2015

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundPractitioners of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies are an important and growing presence in health care systems worldwide. A central question is whether evidence-based behavior change interventions routinely employed in conventional health care could also be integrated into CAM practice to address public health priorities. Essential for successful integration are intervention approaches deemed acceptable and consistent with practice patterns and treatment approaches of different types of CAM practitioners – that is, they have context validity. Intervention development to ensure context validity was integral to Project CAM Reach (CAMR), a project examining the public health potential of tobacco cessation training for chiropractors, acupuncturists and massage therapists (CAM practitioners). This paper describes formative research conducted to achieve this goal.MethodsIntervention development, undertaken in three CAM disciplines (chiropractic, acupuncture, massage therapy), consisted of six iterative steps: 1) exploratory key informant interviews; 2) local CAM practitioner community survey; 3) existing tobacco cessation curriculum demonstration with CAM practitioners; 4) adapting/tailoring of existing curriculum; 5) external review of adaptations; 6) delivery of tailored curriculum to CAM practitioners with follow-up curriculum evaluation.ResultsCAM practitioners identified barriers and facilitators to addressing tobacco use with patients/clients and saw the relevance and acceptability of the intervention content. The intervention development process was attentive to their real world intervention concerns. Extensive intervention tailoring to the context of each CAM discipline was found unnecessary. Participants and advisors from all CAM disciplines embraced training content, deeming it to have broad relevance and application across the three CAM disciplines. All findings informed the final intervention.ConclusionsThe participatory and iterative formative research process yielded an intervention with context validity in real-world CAM practices as it: 1) is patient/client-centered, emphasizing the practitioner’s role in a healing relationship; 2) is responsive to the different contexts of CAM practitioners’ work and patient/client relationships; 3) integrates relevant best practices from US Public Health Service Clinical Practice Guidelines on treating tobacco dependence; and 4) is suited to the range of healing philosophies, scopes of practice and practice patterns found in participating CAM practitioners. The full CAMR study to evaluate the impact of the CAMR intervention on CAM practitioners’ clinical behavior is underway.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Muramoto et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015