| BMC Pediatrics | |
| Minimising impairment: Protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial of upper limb orthoses for children with cerebral palsy | |
| Study Protocol | |
| Elizabeth Bradshaw1  Christine Imms1  Brooke Adair1  Melinda Randall1  Margaret Wallen2  Sophy T. F. Shih3  Rob Carter3  Brian Hoare4  Dinah Reddihough5  Francesca Orsini5  Susan Greaves6  Catherine Elliott7  | |
| [1] Centre for Disability and Development Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, 17 Young Street, 3065, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia;Cerebral Palsy Alliance, PO Box 6427, 2086, Frenchs Forest, NSW, Australia;Deakin University, Building BC, Room BC3.113, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Australia;Monash Children’s Hospital, Clayton, Australia;Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Australia;Royal Children’s Hospital, Flemington Rd, 3052, Parkville, Australia;School of Occupational Therapy and Social Work, Curtin University, Bentley, Australia; | |
| 关键词: Upper extremity; Splint; Orthosis; Children; Cerebral palsy; Occupational therapy; Intervention; Randomised trial; Cost-effectiveness; | |
| DOI : 10.1186/s12887-016-0608-8 | |
| received in 2015-10-14, accepted in 2016-05-14, 发布年份 2016 | |
| 来源: Springer | |
PDF
|
|
【 摘 要 】
BackgroundUpper limb orthoses are frequently prescribed for children with cerebral palsy (CP) who have muscle overactivity predominantly due to spasticity, with little evidence of long-term effectiveness. Clinical consensus is that orthoses help to preserve range of movement: nevertheless, they can be complex to construct, expensive, uncomfortable and require commitment from parents and children to wear. This protocol paper describes a randomised controlled trial to evaluate whether long-term use of rigid wrist/hand orthoses (WHO) in children with CP, combined with usual multidisciplinary care, can prevent or reduce musculoskeletal impairments, including muscle stiffness/tone and loss of movement range, compared to usual multidisciplinary care alone.Methods/designThis pragmatic, multicentre, assessor-blinded randomised controlled trial with economic analysis will recruit 194 children with CP, aged 5–15 years, who present with flexor muscle stiffness of the wrist and/or fingers/thumb (Modified Ashworth Scale score ≥1). Children, recruited from treatment centres in Victoria, New South Wales and Western Australia, will be randomised to groups (1:1 allocation) using concealed procedures. All children will receive care typically provided by their treating organisation. The treatment group will receive a custom-made serially adjustable rigid WHO, prescribed for 6 h nightly (or daily) to wear for 3 years. An application developed for mobile devices will monitor WHO wearing time and adverse events. The control group will not receive a WHO, and will cease wearing one if previously prescribed. Outcomes will be measured 6 monthly over a period of 3 years. The primary outcome is passive range of wrist extension, measured with fingers extended using a goniometer at 3 years. Secondary outcomes include muscle stiffness, spasticity, pain, grip strength and hand deformity. Activity, participation, quality of life, cost and cost-effectiveness will also be assessed.DiscussionThis study will provide evidence to inform clinicians, services, funding agencies and parents/carers of children with CP whether the provision of a rigid WHO to reduce upper limb impairment, in combination with usual multidisciplinary care, is worth the effort and costs.Trial registrationANZ Clinical Trials Registry: U1111-1164-0572.
【 授权许可】
CC BY
© Imms et al. 2016
【 预 览 】
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
| RO202311091237814ZK.pdf | 842KB |
【 参考文献 】
- [1]
- [2]
- [3]
- [4]
- [5]
- [6]
- [7]
- [8]
- [9]
- [10]
- [11]
- [12]
- [13]
- [14]
- [15]
- [16]
- [17]
- [18]
- [19]
- [20]
- [21]
- [22]
- [23]
- [24]
- [25]
- [26]
- [27]
- [28]
- [29]
- [30]
- [31]
- [32]
- [33]
- [34]
- [35]
- [36]
- [37]
- [38]
- [39]
- [40]
- [41]
- [42]
- [43]
- [44]
- [45]
- [46]
- [47]
- [48]
- [49]
- [50]
- [51]
- [52]
- [53]
- [54]
- [55]
- [56]
- [57]
- [58]
- [59]
- [60]
- [61]
- [62]
PDF