期刊论文详细信息
BMC Pediatrics
Minimising impairment: Protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial of upper limb orthoses for children with cerebral palsy
Study Protocol
Elizabeth Bradshaw1  Christine Imms1  Brooke Adair1  Melinda Randall1  Margaret Wallen2  Sophy T. F. Shih3  Rob Carter3  Brian Hoare4  Dinah Reddihough5  Francesca Orsini5  Susan Greaves6  Catherine Elliott7 
[1] Centre for Disability and Development Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, 17 Young Street, 3065, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia;Cerebral Palsy Alliance, PO Box 6427, 2086, Frenchs Forest, NSW, Australia;Deakin University, Building BC, Room BC3.113, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Australia;Monash Children’s Hospital, Clayton, Australia;Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Australia;Royal Children’s Hospital, Flemington Rd, 3052, Parkville, Australia;School of Occupational Therapy and Social Work, Curtin University, Bentley, Australia;
关键词: Upper extremity;    Splint;    Orthosis;    Children;    Cerebral palsy;    Occupational therapy;    Intervention;    Randomised trial;    Cost-effectiveness;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12887-016-0608-8
 received in 2015-10-14, accepted in 2016-05-14,  发布年份 2016
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundUpper limb orthoses are frequently prescribed for children with cerebral palsy (CP) who have muscle overactivity predominantly due to spasticity, with little evidence of long-term effectiveness. Clinical consensus is that orthoses help to preserve range of movement: nevertheless, they can be complex to construct, expensive, uncomfortable and require commitment from parents and children to wear. This protocol paper describes a randomised controlled trial to evaluate whether long-term use of rigid wrist/hand orthoses (WHO) in children with CP, combined with usual multidisciplinary care, can prevent or reduce musculoskeletal impairments, including muscle stiffness/tone and loss of movement range, compared to usual multidisciplinary care alone.Methods/designThis pragmatic, multicentre, assessor-blinded randomised controlled trial with economic analysis will recruit 194 children with CP, aged 5–15 years, who present with flexor muscle stiffness of the wrist and/or fingers/thumb (Modified Ashworth Scale score ≥1). Children, recruited from treatment centres in Victoria, New South Wales and Western Australia, will be randomised to groups (1:1 allocation) using concealed procedures. All children will receive care typically provided by their treating organisation. The treatment group will receive a custom-made serially adjustable rigid WHO, prescribed for 6 h nightly (or daily) to wear for 3 years. An application developed for mobile devices will monitor WHO wearing time and adverse events. The control group will not receive a WHO, and will cease wearing one if previously prescribed. Outcomes will be measured 6 monthly over a period of 3 years. The primary outcome is passive range of wrist extension, measured with fingers extended using a goniometer at 3 years. Secondary outcomes include muscle stiffness, spasticity, pain, grip strength and hand deformity. Activity, participation, quality of life, cost and cost-effectiveness will also be assessed.DiscussionThis study will provide evidence to inform clinicians, services, funding agencies and parents/carers of children with CP whether the provision of a rigid WHO to reduce upper limb impairment, in combination with usual multidisciplinary care, is worth the effort and costs.Trial registrationANZ Clinical Trials Registry: U1111-1164-0572.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Imms et al. 2016

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202311091237814ZK.pdf 842KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  • [54]
  • [55]
  • [56]
  • [57]
  • [58]
  • [59]
  • [60]
  • [61]
  • [62]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:9次 浏览次数:3次