Correcting the impact of docking pose generation error on binding affinity prediction

BMC Bioinformatics

Research

Pedro J. Ballester¹  Kwong-Sak Leung²  Hongjian Li²  Man-Hon Wong² 

[1] Cancer Research Center of Marseille, INSERM U1068, F-13009, Marseille, France;Institut Paoli-Calmettes, F-13009, Marseille, France;Aix-Marseille Université, F-13284, Marseille, France;CNRS UMR7258, F-13009, Marseille, France;Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China;

关键词: Molecular docking;    Binding affinity;    Drug discovery;    Machine learning;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12859-016-1169-4

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundPose generation error is usually quantified as the difference between the geometry of the pose generated by the docking software and that of the same molecule co-crystallised with the considered protein. Surprisingly, the impact of this error on binding affinity prediction is yet to be systematically analysed across diverse protein-ligand complexes.ResultsAgainst commonly-held views, we have found that pose generation error has generally a small impact on the accuracy of binding affinity prediction. This is also true for large pose generation errors and it is not only observed with machine-learning scoring functions, but also with classical scoring functions such as AutoDock Vina. Furthermore, we propose a procedure to correct a substantial part of this error which consists of calibrating the scoring functions with re-docked, rather than co-crystallised, poses. In this way, the relationship between Vina-generated protein-ligand poses and their binding affinities is directly learned. As a result, test set performance after this error-correcting procedure is much closer to that of predicting the binding affinity in the absence of pose generation error (i.e. on crystal structures). We evaluated several strategies, obtaining better results for those using a single docked pose per ligand than those using multiple docked poses per ligand.ConclusionsBinding affinity prediction is often carried out on the docked pose of a known binder rather than its co-crystallised pose. Our results suggest than pose generation error is in general far less damaging for binding affinity prediction than it is currently believed. Another contribution of our study is the proposal of a procedure that largely corrects for this error. The resulting machine-learning scoring function is freely available at http://istar.cse.cuhk.edu.hk/rf-score-4.tgzand http://ballester.marseille.inserm.fr/rf-score-4.tgz.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2016

【 图 表 】

12864_2016_3440_Article_IEq22.gif

12864_2017_3601_Article_IEq1.gif

12864_2016_2682_Article_IEq36.gif

12864_2017_3742_Article_IEq2.gif

12864_2016_2821_Article_IEq16.gif

12864_2016_2682_Article_IEq33.gif

12864_2016_2798_Article_IEq6.gif

12864_2016_2789_Article_IEq49.gif

12864_2016_2821_Article_IEq13.gif