期刊论文详细信息
BMC Evolutionary Biology
Prey preference follows phylogeny: evolutionary dietary patterns within the marine gastropod group Cladobranchia (Gastropoda: Heterobranchia: Nudibranchia)
Research Article
Ángel Valdés1  Michael P. Cummings2  Jessica A. Goodheart3  Adam L. Bazinet4  Allen G. Collins5 
[1] Department of Biological Sciences, California State Polytechnic University, 3801 W Temple Ave, 91768, Pomona, CA, USA;Laboratory of Molecular Evolution, Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Maryland, 20742, College Park, MD, USA;Laboratory of Molecular Evolution, Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Maryland, 20742, College Park, MD, USA;NMFS, National Systematics Laboratory, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, PO Box 37012, MRC-153, 20013, Washington, DC, USA;Laboratory of Molecular Evolution, Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Maryland, 20742, College Park, MD, USA;Present address: National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center, 8300 Research Plaza, 21702, Fort Detrick, MD, USA;NMFS, National Systematics Laboratory, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, PO Box 37012, MRC-153, 20013, Washington, DC, USA;
关键词: Mollusca;    phylogenomics;    nudibranchs;    sea slugs;    RNA-Seq;    diet;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12862-017-1066-0
 received in 2017-05-05, accepted in 2017-10-15,  发布年份 2017
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundThe impact of predator-prey interactions on the evolution of many marine invertebrates is poorly understood. Since barriers to genetic exchange are less obvious in the marine realm than in terrestrial or freshwater systems, non-allopatric divergence may play a fundamental role in the generation of biodiversity. In this context, shifts between major prey types could constitute important factors explaining the biodiversity of marine taxa, particularly in groups with highly specialized diets. However, the scarcity of marine specialized consumers for which reliable phylogenies exist hampers attempts to test the role of trophic specialization in evolution. In this study, RNA-Seq data is used to produce a phylogeny of Cladobranchia, a group of marine invertebrates that feed on a diverse array of prey taxa but mostly specialize on cnidarians. The broad range of prey type preferences allegedly present in two major groups within Cladobranchia suggest that prey type shifts are relatively common over evolutionary timescales.ResultsIn the present study, we generated a well-supported phylogeny of the major lineages within Cladobranchia using RNA-Seq data, and used ancestral state reconstruction analyses to better understand the evolution of prey preference. These analyses answered several fundamental questions regarding the evolutionary relationships within Cladobranchia, including support for a clade of species from Arminidae as sister to Tritoniidae (which both preferentially prey on Octocorallia). Ancestral state reconstruction analyses supported a cladobranchian ancestor with a preference for Hydrozoa and show that the few transitions identified only occur from lineages that prey on Hydrozoa to those that feed on other types of prey.ConclusionsThere is strong phylogenetic correlation with prey preference within Cladobranchia, suggesting that prey type specialization within this group has inertia. Shifts between different types of prey have occurred rarely throughout the evolution of Cladobranchia, indicating that this may not have been an important driver of the diversity within this group.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s). 2017

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202311090067246ZK.pdf 1258KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  • [54]
  • [55]
  • [56]
  • [57]
  • [58]
  • [59]
  • [60]
  • [61]
  • [62]
  • [63]
  • [64]
  • [65]
  • [66]
  • [67]
  • [68]
  • [69]
  • [70]
  • [71]
  • [72]
  • [73]
  • [74]
  • [75]
  • [76]
  • [77]
  • [78]
  • [79]
  • [80]
  • [81]
  • [82]
  • [83]
  • [84]
  • [85]
  • [86]
  • [87]
  • [88]
  • [89]
  • [90]
  • [91]
  • [92]
  • [93]
  • [94]
  • [95]
  • [96]
  • [97]
  • [98]
  • [99]
  • [100]
  • [101]
  • [102]
  • [103]
  • [104]
  • [105]
  • [106]
  • [107]
  • [108]
  • [109]
  • [110]
  • [111]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:0次