Perioperative cerebral blood flow measured by arterial spin labeling with different postlabeling delay in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: a comparison study with CT perfusion

Frontiers in Neuroscience

Neuroscience

Xihai Zhao¹  Hualu Han¹  Tao Wang²  Huishu Yuan³  Huimin Xu³  Ying Liu³  Ran Huo³  Ning Lang³ 

[1] Department of Biomedical Engineering, Center for Biomedical Imaging Research, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China;Department of Neurosurgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China;Department of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China;

关键词: magnetic resonance imaging;    multidetector computed tomography;    perfusion;    carotid endarterectomy;    arterial spin labeling;   

DOI  :  10.3389/fnins.2023.1200273

 received in 2023-04-04, accepted in 2023-08-21,  发布年份 2023

来源: Frontiers

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundArterial spin labeling (ASL) is a non-invasive technique for measuring cerebral perfusion. Its accuracy is affected by the arterial transit time. This study aimed to (1) evaluate the accuracy of ASL in measuring the cerebral perfusion of patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and (2) determine a better postlabeling delay (PLD) for pre- and postoperative perfusion imaging between 1.5 and 2.0 s.MethodsA total of 24 patients scheduled for CEA due to severe carotid stenosis were included in this study. All patients underwent ASL with two PLDs (1.5 and 2.0 s) and computed tomography perfusion (CTP) before and after surgery. Cerebral blood flow (CBF) values were measured on the registered CBF images of ASL and CTP. The correlation in measuring perioperative relative CBF (rCBF) and difference ratio of CBF (DRCBF) between ASL with PLD of 1.5 s (ASL1.5) or 2.0 s (ASL2.0) and CTP were also determined.ResultsThere were no significant statistical differences in preoperative rCBF measurements between ASL1.5 and CTP (p = 0.17) and between ASL2.0 and CTP (p = 0.42). Similarly, no significant differences were found in rCBF between ASL1.5 and CTP (p = 0.59) and between ASL2.0 and CTP (p = 0.93) after CEA. The DRCBF measured by CTP was found to be marginally lower than that measured by ASL2.0_1.5 (p = 0.06) and significantly lower than that measured by ASL1.5_1.5 (p = 0.01), ASL2.0_2.0 (p = 0.03), and ASL1.5_2.0 (p = 0.007). There was a strong correlation in measuring perioperative rCBF and DRCBF between ASL and CTP (r = 0.67–0.85, p < 0.001). Using CTP as the reference standard, smaller bias can be achieved in measuring rCBF by ASL2.0 (−0.02) than ASL1.5 (−0.07) before CEA. In addition, the same bias (0.03) was obtained by ASL2.0 and ASL1.5 after CEA. The bias of ASL2.0_2.0 (0.31) and ASL2.0_1.5 (0.32) on DRCBF measurement was similar, and both were smaller than that of ASL1.5_1.5 (0.60) and ASL1.5_2.0 (0.60).ConclusionStrong correlation can be found in assessing perioperative cerebral perfusion between ASL and CTP. During perioperative ASL imaging, the PLD of 2.0 s is better than 1.5 s for preoperative scan, and both 1.5 and 2.0 s are suitable for postoperative scan.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   
Copyright © 2023 Xu, Han, Liu, Huo, Lang, Yuan, Wang and Zhao.