Gamma camera-specific reference standards for radioactive iodine uptake measurements

EJNMMI Physics

Original Research

Jurgen E. M. Mourik¹  Mark Derks²  Marc R. J. ten Broek³  Erik T. te Beek⁴ 

[1] Department of Nuclear Medicine, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland Hospital, Kleiweg 500, 3045 PM, Rotterdam, The Netherlands;Department of Nuclear Medicine, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, The Netherlands;Department of Nuclear Medicine, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, The Netherlands;Department of Nuclear Medicine, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, The Netherlands;Department of Nuclear Medicine, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, The Netherlands;

关键词: Radioiodine uptake test;    RAIU;    Gamma camera;    Reference standard;    Region-of-interest;    Isotope formulation;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s40658-023-00575-2

 received in 2023-01-31, accepted in 2023-09-05,  发布年份 2023

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundCurrent guidelines of the radioiodine uptake (RAIU) test allow the use of different equipment, isotopes, activity and region-of-interest (ROI). We evaluated presence and extent of these differences in clinical practice and evaluated the effect of some of these variations on RAIU outcomes. Also, gamma camera-specific reference standards were calculated and retrospectively compared with measurements obtained during clinical RAIU tests.Materials and methodsFirst, questionnaires were sent to Dutch nuclear medicine departments requesting information about equipment usage, isotope, isotope formulation, activity and measurement techniques. Secondly, a neck phantom containing a range of activities in capsule or water-dissolved formulation was scanned. Counts were measured using automatic ROI, square box ROI or all counts in the image. Thirdly, clinical RAIU data were collected during 2015–2018 using three different gamma cameras. Reference standards for each scanner were calculated using regression analysis between reference activity and measured counts. Uptake measurements using this gamma camera-specific reference standard were compared with original measurements.ResultsThe survey demonstrated significant differences in isotope, isotope formulation, activity, use of neck phantoms, frequency and duration of reference measurements, distance to collimator, use of background measurements and ROI delineation. The phantom study demonstrated higher counts for the water-dissolved formulation than capsules using both automatic and square box ROI. Also, higher counts were found using a square box ROI than an automatic ROI. The retrospective study showed feasibility of RAIU calculations using camera-specific reference standards and good correlation with the original RAIU measurements.ConclusionsThis study demonstrated considerable technical variation in RAIU measurement in clinical practice. The phantom study demonstrated that these differences could result in differences in count measurements, potentially resulting in different dose calculations for radioactive iodine therapy. Retrospective data suggest that camera-specific reference standards may be used instead of individual reference measurements using separate activity sources, which may thus eliminate some sources of variation.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023

【 图 表 】

Fig. 4

Fig. 1