期刊论文详细信息
International Journal of Implant Dentistry
Evaluation of the clinical safety and performance of a narrow diameter (2.9 mm) bone-level implant: a 1-year prospective single-arm multicenter study
Research
Johannes Kleinheinz1  Jan Herrmann2  Marcus Oliver Klein3  Christian Walter4  Bilal Al-Nawas5  Keyvan Sagheb5  Sebastian Blatt5 
[1] Department of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany;Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Private Dental Office, Lothar-Streit-Straße 10B, 08056, Zwickau, Germany;Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Private Dental Office, Stresemannstraße 7-9, 40210, Düsseldorf, Germany;Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of the Mediplus Clinic, Haifa-Allee 20, 55128, Mainz, Germany;Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany;Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany;
关键词: Narrow-diameter implant;    Bone-level tapered;    Roxolid;    Prospective study;    Implant survival;    PES;    Marginal bone-level change;    Implant success;    Adverse device events;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s40729-023-00495-x
 received in 2023-04-13, accepted in 2023-08-29,  发布年份 2023
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

PurposeNarrow-diameter implants facilitate single‐tooth restoration when interdental or inter-implant spaces and bone volume are inadequate for using standard diameter implants. This study reports the short-term data on the clinical safety and performance of a bone-level-tapered two-piece implant with a 2.9 mm diameter in the clinical practice setting. This study was retrospectively registered on March 1st, 2016 (NCT02699866).MethodsImplants were placed in partially healed extraction sockets of the central and lateral incisors in the mandible and lateral incisors in the maxilla for single-tooth replacement. The primary outcome was to assess implant survival at 12 months after placement. Secondary outcomes included implant success, pink esthetic score, marginal bone-level changes, and safety.ResultsTwenty four males and 17 females with a mean age of 44.5 (± 18.3 standard deviation) received the implant. Three out of 41 implants were lost yielding a survival rate of 92.7% (95%-CI: 79.0%; 97.6%) at 1 year. One patient reported an ongoing foreign body sensation, pain, and/or dysesthesia at month 12. The average pink esthetic score at 6 months was 11.2 (95%-CI: 10.5; 11.9). The bone level was stable with a mean bone-level change of—0.3 mm (± 0.42 mm standard deviation) at 1 year after implantation. No serious adverse events or adverse device events were reported.ConclusionsThe use of a 2.9 mm diameter bone-level-tapered implant is a safe and reliable treatment option for narrow tooth gaps at the indicated locations. Overall performance and good survival rates support their use in cases, where wider implants are unsuitable.Graphical abstract

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Deutsche Gesellschaft für Implantologie im Zahn‐, Mund‐ und Kieferbereich e.V., Japanese Society of Oral Implantology 2023

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202310115071372ZK.pdf 1250KB PDF download
13690_2023_1170_Article_IEq217.gif 1KB Image download
Fig. 1 218KB Image download
Fig. 1 73KB Image download
Fig. 1 135KB Image download
12888_2023_5172_Article_IEq15.gif 1KB Image download
Fig. 3 166KB Image download
12888_2023_5172_Article_IEq18.gif 1KB Image download
12888_2023_5168_Article_IEq4.gif 1KB Image download
【 图 表 】

12888_2023_5168_Article_IEq4.gif

12888_2023_5172_Article_IEq18.gif

Fig. 3

12888_2023_5172_Article_IEq15.gif

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

13690_2023_1170_Article_IEq217.gif

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:3次 浏览次数:1次