Physical performance testing in climbing—A systematic review

Frontiers in Sports and Active Living

Sports and Active Living

Kaja Langer¹  Christian Simon²  Josef Wiemeyer² 

[1] Correspondence:;Laboratory for Movement & Exercise Science, Institute of Sports Science, Department of Human Sciences, Technical University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany;

关键词: performance;    strength;    endurance;    flexibility;    bouldering;    testing;    measuring;   

DOI  :  10.3389/fspor.2023.1130812

 received in 2022-12-23, accepted in 2023-04-17,  发布年份 2023

来源: Frontiers

【 摘 要 】

Due to the increasing popularity of climbing, the corresponding diagnostics are gaining in importance for both science and practice. This review aims to give an overview of the quality of different diagnostic testing- and measurement methods for performance, strength, endurance, and flexibility in climbing. A systematic literature search for studies including quantitative methods and tests for measuring different forms of strength, endurance, flexibility, or performance in climbing and bouldering was conducted on PubMed and SPORT Discus. Studies and abstracts were included if they a) worked with a representative sample of human boulderers and/or climbers, b) included detailed information on at least one test, and c) were randomized-controlled-, cohort-, cross-over-, intervention-, or case studies. 156 studies were included into the review. Data regarding subject characteristics, as well as the implementation and quality of all relevant tests were extracted from the studies. Tests with similar exercises were grouped and the information on a) measured value, b) unit, c) subject characteristics (sex and ability level), and d) quality criteria (objectivity, reliability, validity) were bundled and displayed in standardized tables. In total, 63 different tests were identified, of which some comprised different ways of implementation. This clearly shows that there are no uniform or standard procedures in climbing diagnostics, for tests on strength, endurance or flexibility. Furthermore, only few studies report data on test quality and detailed information on sample characteristics. This not only makes it difficult to compare test results, but at the same time makes it impossible to give precise test recommendations. Nevertheless, this overview of the current state of research contributes to the creation of more uniform test batteries in the future.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   
© 2023 Langer, Simon and Wiemeyer.