Global drivers of timber carbon stock from income-based perspective

Frontiers in Environmental Science

Environmental Science

Siyi Wang¹  Ying Wei²  Chang Yu²  Yao You²  Meng Yi²  Yuxin Yu²  Weidi Zhang²  Ruichao Li² 

[1] Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, China;School of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China;

关键词: timber carbon stock;    income-based;    MRIO;    trade;    consumption-based;    production-based;   

DOI  :  10.3389/fenvs.2023.1149492

 received in 2023-01-22, accepted in 2023-06-05,  发布年份 2023

来源: Frontiers

【 摘 要 】

Introduction: Timber and its products are key carriers of carbon stocks and can cause a hysteresis effect of carbon release in the carbon cycle of forest ecosystems. The literature regarding the cross-regional flow of timber carbon stock mainly pays attention to production- and consumption-based perspectives, which cannot reflect how the primary inputs drive timber carbon stock flow. The income-based perspective accounting can identify the influence of primary input suppliers and supplement research on timber carbon stock embodied in trade. The goal of this paper is to explore the cross-regional flow of global timber carbon stock and identify the critical countries from an income-based perspective.Methods: We used the Ghosh-multi-regional input-output (MRIO) model to calculate the income-based timber carbon stock flow among 190 countries. Furthermore, combined with the Leontief-MRIO model, a comparative analysis is carried out to analyze the different results of the income-based, production-based, and consumption-based methods.Results: The results showed that the income-based timber carbon stock of the United States and China were among the top countries in imports and exports simultaneously. However, their export volumes were significantly larger, meaning that these countries have invested more primary resources in timber products. The timber carbon stock of the United States mainly flows into Canada and Brazil. In China, the largest flow went to Canada. Furthermore, the flow to the United States increased significantly. Moreover, comparing the three perspectives shows that the United States’ primary inputs have a greater impact on the global timber production chain than their production- and consumption-based roles. Brazil and Russia, as main primary resource suppliers of timber carbon stock, are more important than as final consumers.Discussion: The research can contribute to clarify the flow of forest resources embodied in global trade activities. Furthermore, it also provides a scientific basis to fairly account for carbon offset shares to achieve better the goal of forest resource protection agreed upon in COP26.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   
Copyright © 2023 Wei, Yi, Yu, You, Zhang, Li, Yu and Wang.