期刊论文详细信息
Frontiers in Oncology
Factors associated with unsatisfactory cosmetic results in oncoplastic surgery
Oncology
Almir José Sarri1  Gabriele Biller2  Fabíola Cristina Brandini da Silva3  Eliana Aguiar Petri Nahás4  René Aloísio da Costa Vieira5  Idam de Oliveira-Junior6 
[1] Nucleous of Mastology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Sao Paulo, Brazil;Postgraduate Program of Oncology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Sao Paulo, Brazil;Faculty of Health Sciences of Barretos Dr. Paulo Prata (FACISB) School of Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil;Postgraduate Program of Oncology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Sao Paulo, Brazil;Nucleous of Mastology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Sao Paulo, Brazil;Postgraduate Program of Tocogynecology, Botucatu Medical School, Sao Paulo State University, UNESP, Sao Paulo, Brazil;Postgraduate Program of Tocogynecology, Botucatu Medical School, Sao Paulo State University, UNESP, Sao Paulo, Brazil;Postgraduate Program of Oncology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Sao Paulo, Brazil;Postgraduate Program of Tocogynecology, Botucatu Medical School, Sao Paulo State University, UNESP, Sao Paulo, Brazil;Postgraduate Program of Oncology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Sao Paulo, Brazil;Nucleous of Mastology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Sao Paulo, Brazil;
关键词: breast cancer;    conservative surgery;    breast-conserving surgery;    oncoplastic surgery;    cosmesis;   
DOI  :  10.3389/fonc.2023.1071127
 received in 2022-10-15, accepted in 2023-07-10,  发布年份 2023
来源: Frontiers
PDF
【 摘 要 】

IntroductionOncoplastic surgery (OS) has expanded the indications for breast-conserving surgery associated with an adequate aesthetic result. However, few studies have described the factors associated with unsatisfactory cosmetic outcomes from this surgical modality.Materials and methodsThis is a cross-sectional prospective study that included patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with or without OS. The patients self-evaluated the cosmetic results of the breasts posttreatment and had them photographed. The photos were analyzed by BCCT.core. Individual and treatment factors (local and systemic) for all patients were evaluated. These factors were dichotomized according to the use of OS and to the cosmetic result (satisfactory and unsatisfactory). Categorical variables were tested for association with surgical outcome using the chi-square test while numerical variables using the Mann−Whitney U test. Variables with p <0,2 were selected for multivariate analysis.ResultsOf the 300 patients evaluated, 72 (24,0%) underwent OS. According to the patient self-evaluations, an unsatisfactory cosmetic result from OS was significantly associated with younger age at diagnosis, higher body mass index (BMI) at the time of evaluation, larger tumor size and greater weight of the surgical specimen. According to the BCCT.core, only the laterality of the tumor (left) was significantly associated with an unsatisfactory cosmetic result. In logistic regression, considering OS as a control variable, the risk of an unsatisfactory outcome according to patient self-evaluation was related to the tumor ≥ T2 odds ratio (OR) 1,85 (1,027-3,34) and age at diagnosis < 40 [OR 5,0 (1,84-13,95)]. However, according to the software, the variables were associated with an increased risk of an unsatisfactory outcome were the time interval between surgery and evaluation [OR 1,27 (1,16-1,39)], the presence of lymphedema [OR 2,97 (1,36-6,46)], surgical wound infection [OR 3,6 (1,22-11,16)], tumor location on the left side [OR 3,06 (1,69-5,53)], overweight [OR 2,93 (1,48-5,8)] and obesity [OR 2,52 (1,2-5,31)].ConclusionThere is no standard methodology for breast cosmesis evaluation, which influences the factors associated with unsatisfactory results. Younger patients and those with increased BMI, left breast cancer and extensive resections tend to present with unsatisfactory cosmetic results when OS is performed.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   
Copyright © 2023 de Oliveira-Junior, da Costa Vieira, Biller, Sarri, da Silva and Nahás

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202310102525587ZK.pdf 525KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:3次 浏览次数:0次