期刊论文详细信息
Environmental Microbiome
Elucidating the effects of organic vs. conventional cropping practice and rhizobia inoculation on rhizosphere microbial diversity and yield of peanut
Research
Esteban Rios1  Jianping Wang1  Dev Paudel1  Janam P Acharya1  Cleber Henrique Lopes de Souza1  Liping Wang1  Samantha Victores1  Ravin Poudel2 
[1] Agronomy Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA;Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA;
关键词: Microbiome;    Rhizosphere;    16S rRNA;    Soil;    Peanut;    Nodules;    Legume;    Organic;    Inorganic;    Conventional;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s40793-023-00517-6
 received in 2023-04-11, accepted in 2023-07-09,  发布年份 2023
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Legumes such as peanut (Arachis hypogea) can fulfill most of their nitrogen requirement by symbiotic association with nitrogen-fixing bacteria, rhizobia. Nutrient availability is largely determined by microbial diversity and activity in the rhizosphere that influences plant health, nutrition, and crop yield, as well as soil quality and soil fertility. However, our understanding of the complex effects of microbial diversity and rhizobia inoculation on crop yields of different peanut cultivars under organic versus conventional farming systems is extremely limited. In this research, we studied the impacts of conventional vs. organic cultivation practices and inoculation with commercial vs. single strain inoculum on peanut yield and soil microbial diversity of five peanut cultivars. The experiment was set up in the field following a split-split-plot design. Our results from the 16 S microbiome sequencing showed considerable variations of microbial composition between the cultivation types and inoculum, indicating a preferential association of microbes to peanut roots with various inoculum and cropping system. Alpha diversity indices (chao1, Shannon diversity, and Simpson index) of soil microbiome were generally higher in plots with organic than conventional inorganic practices. The cultivation type and inoculum explained significant differences among bacterial communities. Taxonomic classification revealed two phyla, TM6 and Firmicutes were significantly represented in inorganic as compared to organic soil, where significant phyla were Armatimonadetes, Gemmatimonadetes, Nitrospirae, Proteobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, and WS3. Yields in the organic cultivation system decreased by 10–93% of the yields in the inorganic cultivation system. Cultivar G06 and T511 consistently showed relative high yields in both organic and inorganic trials. Our results show significant two-way interactions between cultivation type and genotype for most of the trait data collected. Therefore, it is critical for farmers to choose varieties based on their cultivation practices. Our results showed that bacterial structure was more uniform in organic fields and microbial diversity in legumes was reduced in inorganic fields. This research provided guides for farmers and scientists to improve peanut yield while promoting microbial diversity and increasing sustainability.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2023

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202309159573297ZK.pdf 2488KB PDF download
Fig. 1 156KB Image download
Fig. 2 233KB Image download
MediaObjects/12974_2023_2870_MOESM1_ESM.png 707KB Other download
Fig. 5 840KB Image download
13570_2023_282_Article_IEq4.gif 1KB Image download
13570_2023_282_Article_IEq6.gif 1KB Image download
13570_2023_282_Article_IEq8.gif 1KB Image download
【 图 表 】

13570_2023_282_Article_IEq8.gif

13570_2023_282_Article_IEq6.gif

13570_2023_282_Article_IEq4.gif

Fig. 5

Fig. 2

Fig. 1

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  • [54]
  • [55]
  • [56]
  • [57]
  • [58]
  • [59]
  • [60]
  • [61]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:6次 浏览次数:0次