期刊论文详细信息
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Robotic arm training in neurorehabilitation enhanced by augmented reality – a usability and feasibility study
Research
Salome-Thamar Ruhnau1  Jérémy Lefint2  Tamara Amberger3  Hans Brunner3  Friedemann Müller3  Jürgen Dressnandt3  Alexandra Charlotte de Crignis3  Matthias Hösl4 
[1] BEC GmbH, Pfullingen, Germany;Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing, Engineering and Automation IPA, Stuttgart, Germany;Schön Klinik Bad Aibling, Bad Aibling, Germany;Schön Klinik Bad Aibling, Bad Aibling, Germany;Schön Klinik Vogtareuth, Vogtareuth, Germany;
关键词: Augmented reality;    Virtual reality;    Active video gaming;    Stroke;    Neurorehabilitation;    Robotic therapy;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12984-023-01225-5
 received in 2022-05-26, accepted in 2023-07-26,  发布年份 2023
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundRobotic therapy and serious gaming support motor learning in neurorehabilitation. Traditional monitor-based gaming outputs cannot adequately represent the third dimension, whereas virtual reality headsets lack the connection to the real world. The use of Augmented Reality (AR) techniques could potentially overcome these issues. The objective of this study was thus to evaluate the usability, feasibility and functionality of a novel arm rehabilitation device for neurorehabilitation (RobExReha system) based on a robotic arm (LBR iiwa, KUKA AG) and serious gaming using the AR headset HoloLens (Microsoft Inc.).MethodsThe RobExReha system was tested with eleven adult inpatients (mean age: 64.4 ± 11.2 years; diagnoses: 8 stroke, 2 spinal cord injury, 1 Guillain-Barré-Syndrome) who had paretic impairments in their upper limb. Five therapists administered and evaluated the system. Data was compared with a Reference Group (eleven inpatients; mean age: 64.3 ± 9.1 years; diagnoses: 10 stroke, 1 spinal cord injury) who trained with commercially available robotic therapy devices (ArmeoPower or ArmeoSpring, Hocoma AG). Patients used standardized questionnaires for evaluating usability and comfort (Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive technology [QUEST]), workload (Raw Task Load Index [RTLX]) and a questionnaire for rating visual perception of the gaming scenario. Therapists used the QUEST, the System Usability Scale and the short version of the User Experience Questionnaire.ResultsTherapy with the RobExReha system was safe and feasible for patients and therapists, with no serious adverse events being reported. Patients and therapists were generally satisfied with usability. The patients’ usability ratings were significantly higher in the Reference Group for two items of the QUEST: reliability and ease of use. Workload (RTLX) ratings did not differ significantly between the groups. Nearly all patients using the RobExReha system perceived the gaming scenario in AR as functioning adequately despite eight patients having impairments in stereoscopic vision. The therapists valued the system’s approach as interesting and inventive.ConclusionsWe demonstrated the clinical feasibility of combining a novel robotic upper limb robot with an AR-serious game in a neurorehabilitation setting. To ensure high usability in future applications, a reliable and easy-to-use system that can be used for task-oriented training should be implemented.Trial registrationEthical approval was obtained and the trial was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00022136).

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202309153229698ZK.pdf 2220KB PDF download
MediaObjects/12888_2023_5109_MOESM1_ESM.docx 17KB Other download
40854_2023_500_Article_IEq6.gif 1KB Image download
Fig. 2 97KB Image download
Fig. 5 86KB Image download
MediaObjects/40560_2023_680_MOESM1_ESM.docx 144KB Other download
Fig. 3 924KB Image download
955KB Image download
Fig. 6 2821KB Image download
MediaObjects/12951_2023_1985_MOESM1_ESM.pdf 2132KB PDF download
【 图 表 】

Fig. 6

Fig. 3

Fig. 5

Fig. 2

40854_2023_500_Article_IEq6.gif

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:7次 浏览次数:2次