The Dutch Solid Start program: describing the implementation and experiences of the program's first thousand days

BMC Health Services Research

Research

Jessica C. Kiefte- de Jong¹  Inge C. Boesveld²  Joyce M. Molenaar³  Jeroen N. Struijs³ 

[1] Department of Public Health and Primary Care/ Health Campus The Hague, Leiden University Medical Centre, 2511, The Hague, DP, the Netherlands;Department of Quality of Care and Health Economics, Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), 3721, Bilthoven, MA, the Netherlands;Department of Quality of Care and Health Economics, Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), 3721, Bilthoven, MA, the Netherlands;Department of Public Health and Primary Care/ Health Campus The Hague, Leiden University Medical Centre, 2511, The Hague, DP, the Netherlands;

关键词: Cross-sectoral collaboration;    Integrated care;    Health inequities;    Maternal and child health;    First thousand days;    Solid Start program;    Rainbow Model of Integrated Care;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12913-023-09873-y

 received in 2023-04-24, accepted in 2023-08-03,  发布年份 2023

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundIn 2018, the Dutch government initiated the Solid Start program to provide each child the best start in life. The program focuses on the crucial first thousand days of life, which span from preconception to a child’s second birthday, and has a specific focus towards (future) parents and young children in vulnerable situations. A key program element is improving collaboration between the medical and social sector by creating Solid Start coalitions. This study aimed to describe the implementation of the Dutch Solid Start program, in order to learn for future practice and policy. Specifically, this paper describes to what extent Solid Start is implemented within municipalities and outlines stakeholders’ experiences with the implementation of Solid Start and the associated cross-sectoral collaboration.MethodsQuantitative and qualitative data were collected from 2019 until 2021. Questionnaires were sent to all 352 Dutch municipalities and analyzed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data were obtained through focus group discussions(n = 6) and semi-structured interviews(n = 19) with representatives of care and support organizations, knowledge institutes and professional associations, Solid Start project leaders, advisors, municipal officials, researchers, clients and experts-by-experience. Qualitative data were analyzed using the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care.ResultsFindings indicated progress in the development of Solid Start coalitions(n = 40 in 2019, n = 140 in 2021), and an increase in cross-sectoral collaboration. According to the stakeholders, initiating Solid Start increased the sense of urgency concerning the importance of the first thousand days and stimulated professionals from various backgrounds to get to know each other, resulting in more collaborative agreements on cross-sectoral care provision. Important elements mentioned for effective collaboration within coalitions were an active coordinator as driving force, and a shared societal goal. However, stakeholders experienced that Solid Start is not yet fully incorporated into all professionals’ everyday practice. Most common barriers for collaboration related to systemic integration at macro-level, including limited resources and collaboration-inhibiting regulations. Stakeholders emphasized the importance of ensuring Solid Start and mentioned various needs, including sustainable funding, supportive regulations, responsiveness to stakeholders’ needs, ongoing knowledge development, and client involvement.ConclusionSolid Start, as a national program with strong local focus, has led to various incremental changes that supported cross-sectoral collaboration to improve care during the first thousand days, without major transformations of systemic structures. However, to ensure the program’s sustainability, needs such as sustainable funding should be addressed.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023

【 图 表 】

40517_2023_266_Article_IEq49.gif

40517_2023_266_Article_IEq37.gif

40517_2023_266_Article_IEq18.gif

12888_2023_5115_Article_IEq1.gif

Fig. 7