Dissemination of knowledge from Cochrane Public Health reviews: a bibliographic study

Systematic Reviews

Research

Karina Karolina De Santis¹  Lea Mergenthal²  Mia Reimer²  Katja Matthias³  Stefanie Maria Helmer⁴ 

[1] Cochrane Public Health Europe (https://ph.cochrane.org/cochrane-public-health-europe), Bremen, Germany;Department of Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology—BIPS, Bremen, Germany;Department of Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology—BIPS, Bremen, Germany;Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Applied Science Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany;Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, Faculty 11 Human and Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Grazer Str. 4, 28359, Bremen, Germany;Cochrane Public Health Europe (https://ph.cochrane.org/cochrane-public-health-europe), Bremen, Germany;

关键词: Dissemination;    Knowledge translation;    Stakeholder;    Systematic review;    Cochrane;    Public health;    Meta-research;    Bibliographic study;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s13643-023-02272-8

 received in 2022-11-15, accepted in 2023-06-15,  发布年份 2023

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundAppropriate dissemination of public health evidence is of high importance to ensure that scientific knowledge reaches potential stakeholders and relevant population groups. A wide distrust towards science and its findings indicates that communication thereof remains below its potential. Cochrane Public Health provides an important source of high-quality scientific evidence in the field of public health via reviews with systematic methodology. The aims of this study were to identify (1) dissemination strategies and (2) stakeholders of Cochrane Public Health reviews.MethodsThis is a bibliographic study with a cross-sectional design. All 68 records (reviews or review protocols) listed on the Cochrane Public Health website (https://ph.cochrane.org/cph-reviews-and-topics) up to 8 March 2022 were included. Record characteristics, dissemination strategies, and potential stakeholder details were coded by one author, and 10% of records were checked by another author. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics or narratively into common themes.ResultsThe 68 records were published between 2010 and 2022 and included 15 review protocols and 53 reviews with systematic methodology (46 systematic, 6 rapid, and 1 scoping review). All 53 reviews were disseminated via open-access plain language summaries (PLS) in English with translations into 3–13 other languages. Other dissemination strategies included information on Cochrane websites (e.g., clinical answers or guidelines) available for 41/53 reviews and Cochrane news or blogs that mentioned 19/53 reviews. Overall, 23/68 records mentioned the actual stakeholder involvement in review production, protocol development, or formulation of dissemination plans. The potential stakeholders included several highly diverse groups, such as the general population or specific communities (e.g., racial minority groups), policy and decision makers, and researchers and professionals in various fields (e.g., nutrition, physical activity, education, or care).ConclusionsThis study shows that Cochrane Public Health reviews are disseminated predominantly via PLS in different languages and via review information on Cochrane websites. Planned dissemination strategies were rarely reported although actual stakeholders were involved in the planning and production of some reviews. The relevance of Cochrane Public Health reviews for non-academic stakeholders and the general population highlights the need for the dissemination of evidence from such reviews beyond academia.Systematic review registrationThe study was prospectively registered at the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/ga9pt/).

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2023

【 图 表 】

41116_2023_38_Article_IEq45.gif