期刊论文详细信息
BMC Public Health
Community-based organization perspectives on participating in state-wide community canvassing program aimed to reduce COVID-19 vaccine disparities in California
Research
David Santillan1  Shelli Jackson1  Alana Troutt2  Savanna L. Carson3  Gloria Kim3  Dale Slaughter3  Keith C. Norris3  Stefanie D. Vassar3  Arleen F. Brown4  Lisa N. Mansfield5  Nisha Sunku6 
[1] Blue Phoenix Strategies, Falls Church, VA, USA;California Government Operations Agency, State of California, Sacramento, CA, USA;San Francisco Health Plan, San Francisco, California, United States;Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA;Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA;Olive View-UCLA Medical Center, Sylmar, CA, USA;Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA;School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 27599, Chapel Hill, NC, USA;Olive View-UCLA Medical Center, Sylmar, CA, USA;
关键词: COVID-19;    COVID-19 vaccination;    Health disparities;    Health equity;    Community-engaged research;    Race/ethnicity;    Public health;    Community health;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12889-023-16210-9
 received in 2023-04-28, accepted in 2023-06-28,  发布年份 2023
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundInequities in COVID-19 vaccine accessibility and reliable COVID-related information disproportionately affected marginalized racial and ethnic communities in the U.S. The Get Out the Vaccine (GOTVax) program, an innovative statewide government-funded COVID-19 vaccine canvassing program in California, aimed to reduce structural barriers to COVID-19 vaccination in high-risk communities with low vaccination rates. GOTVax consisted of a community-academic-government partnership with 34 local trusted community-based organizations’ (CBOs) to conduct COVID-19 vaccine outreach, education, and vaccine registration. The purpose of this qualitative evaluation study was to explore the barriers and facilitators of using local CBOs to deploy a geographically, racially, and ethnically diverse state-wide COVID-19 vaccine outreach program.MethodsSemi-structured online interviews were conducted with participating GOTVax CBO leaders from November 2021 to January 2022. Transcripts were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.ResultsThirty-one of 34 CBOs participated (91% response rate). Identified themes encompassed both facilitators and barriers to program participation. Key facilitators included leveraging trust through recognized entities; promoting empathetic, tailored outreach; and flexibility of milestone-based CBO funding contracts for rapid program implementation. Barriers included navigating community sociopolitical, geographic, and cultural factors; managing canvassers’ safety; desiring metrics for self-evaluation of outreach success; mitigating canvassing technology challenges; and concerns of program infrastructure initially limiting outreach. CBOs problem-solved barriers with academic and government partners.ConclusionsBetween May and December 2021, the GOTVax program reached over 2 million California residents and registered over 60,000 residents for COVID-19 vaccination. Public health campaigns may improve benefits from leveraging the expertise of community-trusted CBOs and universities by providing flexible infrastructure and funding, allowing CBOs to seamlessly tailor outreach most applicable to local minoritized communities.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2023

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202309140845817ZK.pdf 1209KB PDF download
41116_2023_38_Article_IEq349.gif 1KB Image download
Fig. 6 130KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Fig. 6

41116_2023_38_Article_IEq349.gif

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:2次 浏览次数:1次