期刊论文详细信息
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
Managers perception of hospital employees’ effort-reward imbalance
Research
Nicole R. Hander1  Rebecca Erschens2  Janna K. Küllenberg3  Johannes Siegrist4  Meike Heming5  Britta Worringer5  Peter Angerer5  Melanie Genrich6  Andreas Müller6  Florian Junne7 
[1]Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Ulm University Medical Center, Albert- Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany
[2]Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tuebingen, University of Tuebingen, 72076, Tuebingen, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany
[3]Institute for Medical Psychology, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Heidelberg, University Hospital Heidelberg, Bergheimer Straße 20, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany
[4]Institute for Research and Development of Collaborative Processes, FHNW School of Applied Psychology, Riggenbachstrasse 16, 4600, Olten, Switzerland
[5]Institute of Medical Sociology, Centre for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany
[6]Institute of Occupational, Social, and Environmental Medicine, Centre for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany
[7]Institute of Psychology, Work and Organisational Psychology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstr. 2, 45141, Essen, Germany
[8]University Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany
关键词: Effort-reward imbalance;    Criterion validity;    External assessment;    Hospital;    Managers;    Employees;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12995-023-00376-4
 received in 2023-03-07, accepted in 2023-05-25,  发布年份 2023
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】
ObjectiveHospitals are frequently associated with poor working conditions that can lead to work stress and increase the risk for reduced employee well-being. Managers can shape and improve working conditions and thereby, the health of their teams. Thus, as a prerequisite, managers need to be aware of their employees’ stress levels. This study had two objectives: At first, it aimed to test the criterion validity of the Effort-Reward Imbalance (ERI) questionnaire measuring psychosocial workload in hospital employees. Secondly, mean scales of the ERI questionnaire filled in by employees were compared with mean scales of an adapted ERI questionnaire, in which managers assessed working conditions of their employees.MethodsManagers (n = 141) from three hospitals located in Germany assessed working conditions of their employees with an adapted external, other-oriented questionnaire. Employees (n = 197) of the mentioned hospitals completed the short version of the ERI questionnaire to assess their working conditions. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were applied to test factorial validity, using the ERI scales for the two study groups. Criterion validity was assessed with multiple linear regression analysis of associations between ERI scales and well-being among employees.ResultsThe questionnaires demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties in terms of internal consistency of scales, although some indices of model fit resulting from CFA were of borderline significance. Concerning the first objective, effort, reward, and the ratio of effort-reward imbalance were significantly associated with well-being of employees. With regard to the second objective, first tentative findings showed that managers’ ratings of their employees’ effort at work was quite accurate, whereas their reward was overestimated.ConclusionsWith its documented criterion validity the ERI questionnaire can be used as a screening tool of workload among hospital employees. Moreover, in the context of work-related health promotion, managers’ perceptions of their employees’ workload deserve increased attention as first findings point to some discrepancies between their perceptions and those provided by employees.
【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2023

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202309079415336ZK.pdf 850KB PDF download
40517_2023_259_Article_IEq88.gif 1KB Image download
40517_2023_259_Article_IEq57.gif 1KB Image download
【 图 表 】

40517_2023_259_Article_IEq57.gif

40517_2023_259_Article_IEq88.gif

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:0次