期刊论文详细信息
World Journal of Surgical Oncology | |
Three-port approach vs conventional laparoscopic radical cystectomy with orthotopic neobladder: a single-center retrospective study | |
Research | |
Shuxin Dai1  Zhouting Tuo1  Xiangyu Teng1  Chang Liu1  Dian Xia1  Xin Wang1  Zhiwei Jiang1  Songbai Yan1  Qi Wang1  Liangkuan Bi2  | |
[1]Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, NO. 678 Furong Road, 230032, Hefei, China | |
[2]Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, NO. 678 Furong Road, 230032, Hefei, China | |
[3]Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China | |
关键词: Three-port; Five-port; Laparoscopic radical cystectomy; Surgical treatment; Bladder cancer; | |
DOI : 10.1186/s12957-023-03031-8 | |
received in 2023-01-04, accepted in 2023-05-03, 发布年份 2023 | |
来源: Springer | |
![]() |
【 摘 要 】
BackgroundThis study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent three-port laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) with orthotopic neobladder (ONB) and traditional five-port method.MethodsFrom January 2017 to November 2020, 100 patients underwent LRC + ONB at a third-level grade A hospital.ResultsOur study included 55 patients who underwent three-port LRC and 45 patients who underwent the five-port method. There were no significant differences in perioperative data such as operation time (253.00 ± 43.89 vs. 259.07 ± 52.31 min, P = 0.530), estimated blood loss (EBL)(97.64 ± 59.44 vs. 106.67 ± 55.35 min, P = 0.438), day to flatus (2.25 ± 1.49 vs. 2.76 ± 1.77 days, P = 0.128), day to regular diet (7.07 ± 2.99 vs. 7.96 ± 3.32 days, P = 0.165), day to pelvic drain removal (9.58 ± 3.25 vs. 10.53 ± 3.80 days, P = 0.180), and hospital stay after operation (11.62 ± 3.72 vs. 11.84 ± 4.37 days, P = 0.780) between the two groups. The only significant difference was in the treatment cost (P = 0.035). Similarly, postoperative complications, quality of life, and tumor outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05).ConclusionsThe three-port method is safe and feasible for patients suitable for traditional five-port LRC with an orthotopic neobladder.【 授权许可】
CC BY
© The Author(s) 2023
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
RO202308156507461ZK.pdf | 1312KB | ![]() |
|
Fig. 4 | 352KB | Image | ![]() |
41116_2023_36_Article_IEq496.gif | 1KB | Image | ![]() |
40798_2023_579_Article_IEq3.gif | 1KB | Image | ![]() |
【 图 表 】
40798_2023_579_Article_IEq3.gif
41116_2023_36_Article_IEq496.gif
Fig. 4
【 参考文献 】
- [1]
- [2]
- [3]
- [4]
- [5]
- [6]
- [7]
- [8]
- [9]
- [10]
- [11]
- [12]
- [13]
- [14]
- [15]
- [16]
- [17]
- [18]
- [19]
- [20]
- [21]
- [22]
- [23]
- [24]
- [25]
- [26]
- [27]
- [28]
- [29]
- [30]
- [31]
- [32]
- [33]
- [34]
- [35]
- [36]
- [37]
- [38]