期刊论文详细信息
Bone & Joint Research
Patient-reported outcome measures used in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a COSMIN systematic review
article
Yiou Wang1  Meihua Yin2  Shibai Zhu1  Xi Chen1  Hongru Zhou3  Wenwei Qian1 
[1] Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Science;Institute of Basic Medical Sciences Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Basic Medicine Peking Union Medical College;Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College
关键词: Patient-reported outcome measure;    Total knee arthroplasty;    Measurement properties;   
DOI  :  10.1302/2046-3758.103.BJR-2020-0268.R1
学科分类:骨科学
来源: British Editorial Society Of Bone And Joint Surgery
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are being used increasingly in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We conducted a systematic review aimed at identifying psychometrically sound PROMs by appraising their measurement properties. Studies concerning the development and/or evaluation of the measurement properties of PROMs used in a TKA population were systematically retrieved via PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus. Ratings for methodological quality and measurement properties were conducted according to updated COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology. Of the 155 articles on 34 instruments included, nine PROMs met the minimum requirements for psychometric validation and can be recommended to use as measures of TKA outcome: Oxford Knee Score (OKS); OKS–Activity and Participation Questionnaire (OKS-APQ); 12-item short form Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome (KOOS-12); KOOS Physical function Short form (KOOS-PS); Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index-Total Knee Replacement function short form (WOMAC-TKR); Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS); Forgotten Joint Score (FJS); Patient’s Knee Implant Performance (PKIP); and University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score. The pain and function subscales in WOMAC, as well as the pain, function, and quality of life subscales in KOOS, were validated psychometrically as standalone subscales instead of as whole instruments. However, none of the included PROMs have been validated for all measurement properties. Thus, further studies are still warranted to evaluate those PROMs. Use of the other 25 scales and subscales should be tempered until further studies validate their measurement properties.

【 授权许可】

CC BY-NC   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202307110000663ZK.pdf 602KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:1次 浏览次数:0次