Valence moderates the effect of stimulus-hand proximity on conflict processing and gaze-cueing

PeerJ

article

Sven Hoffmann¹  Rico Fischer³  Roman Liepelt¹ 

[1] Department of General Psychology, Judgement, Decision Making, Action, University of Hagen;Performance Psychology, Institute of Psychology, German Sport University Cologne;Department of General Psychology, Institute of Psychology, University of Greifswald

关键词: Embodied cognition;    Attention;    Cognitive control;    Simon effect;    Hands-near effect;    Gaze-cueing;   

DOI  :  10.7717/peerj.15286

学科分类：社会科学、人文和艺术（综合）

来源: Inra

【 摘 要 】

An effective interaction with the environment requires adaptation of one’s own behaviour to environmental demands. We do so by using cues from our environment and relating these cues to our body to predict the outcomes of events. The recent literature on embodied cognition suggests that task-relevant stimuli, presented near the hands, receive more attentional capacity and are processed differently than stimuli, presented spatially more distant to our body. It has also been proposed that near-hand processing is beneficial to conflict resolution. In the current study, we tested the assumption of an attentional bias towards the near hand space in the context of our previous work by combining a cueing paradigm (allocation of visual attention) with a conflict processing paradigm (Simon task) in the near vs far hand space. In addition, the relevance of processing was manipulated by using affective (angry vs neutral smileys) gaze cues (i.e., varying the valence of the cues). Our results indicate that (a) the interaction of valence × cue congruency × hand proximity was significant, indicating that the cueing effect was larger for negative valence in the proximal condition. (b) The interaction of valence × Simon compatibility × stimulus-hand proximity interaction was significant, indicating that for negative valence processing, the Simon effect was smaller in the proximal than in the distal stimulus-hand condition. This effect was at least numerically but not significantly reversed in the neutral valence condition. (c) Overall, cue congruency, indicating the correct vs incorrect attention allocation to the target stimulus onset, did not reveal any effect on Simon compatibility × stimulus-hand proximity. Our results suggest that valence, the allocation of attention, and conflict, seem to be decisive factors determining the direction and strength of hand proximity effects.

【 授权许可】

CC BY