期刊论文详细信息
Endodontology
Evaluation of the surface characteristics of nickel–titanium rotary instruments after clinical use: An atomic force microscope study
article
Jain, Namrata1  Nagaraja, Shruthi1  Mathew, Sylvia1  Jethani, Bhawna1  Kumari, Mohini1  Nambiar, Sharanya1  Sasank, Soumya1 
[1] Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dental Sciences, M. S. Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences
关键词: Atomic force microscope;    instrument separation;    nickel–titanium rotary instruments;    root canal treatment;    surface roughness;   
DOI  :  10.4103/endo.endo_230_21
学科分类:材料科学(综合)
来源: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Aim:  This study aimed to compare the surface roughness of two rotary nickel–titanium instrument systems before and after clinical use using atomic force microscope (AFM). Methods:  Sixteen instruments of two rotary nickel–titanium systems were used in this study. Eight MTwo (VDW, Munich, Germany) instruments and eight Neoendo flex rotary files (Orikam Healthcare, India) were evaluated. New and the used rotary files of the two experimental groups were evaluated. Instruments were analyzed on a point at a 5-mm section from the tip of the instrument. Quantitative measurements according to the topographical deviations were recorded. The data were statistically analyzed with paired t-test and independent samples t-test. Results:  The mean root mean square (RMS) values for new and used MTwo 25.06 files were 1.23 ± 0.176 nm and 1.58 ± 0.284 nm, respectively, and the difference between them was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The mean RMS values for new and used NeoEndo Flex Files 25.06 were 0.96 ± 0.34 nm and 1.76 ± 0.414 nm, respectively; the difference between them also was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion:  According to the AFM analysis, the instruments underwent surface deterioration after clinical use and MTwo had better surface quality than NeoEndo Flex Files.

【 授权许可】

CC BY-NC-SA   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202307090000711ZK.pdf 1017KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:43次 浏览次数:8次