A Comparision of Node Detection Algorithms Over Wireless Sensor Network

International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies

article

Hussain Falih Mahdi¹  Mohammed Hasan Alwan²  Baidaa AL-Bander³  Aws Zuhair⁴ 

[1] Engineering College, Diyala University;Mohammed Hasan AlwanElectrical power Engineering Techniques Department,Bilad Alrafidain University College;Computer Engineering Department, Engineering College, Diyala University Baqubah;Department of Medical Instrumentation Engineering Techniques, College of Medical Techniques, Al-Farahidi University

关键词: secure detection;    MANET;    Ad-hoc network;    strict preference;    round robin;    weighted round robin (WRR);    weighted fair;   

DOI  :  10.3991/ijim.v16i07.24609

学科分类：社会科学、人文和艺术（综合）

来源: International Association of Online Engineering

【 摘 要 】

MANET is standing for Network as Mobile Ad-hoc which is a self-directed mobile handlers group which communicates over relatively bandwidth constrained wireless channels. Many services with different classes of Quality of Services (QoS) could be provided through the MANET such as data, voice, and video streaming. Thus, efficient packets routing is an essential issue especially over this kind of burst channel. To settle this issue, many scheduling techniques are proposed to reduce the packets dropping and channel collision when a huge demand of data is transferred from a sender to a receiver. In this paper, four MANET scheduling algorithms are selected and investigated in mobile ad hoc network which are Strict Preference (SP), Round Robin (RR), Weighted Round Robin (WRR), and Weighted Fair (WF). The network simulator EXata 2.0.1 is used to build the scenario which is consist of 50 nodes and performed the simulation. The results showed the performance metrics difference of the network such as the throughput and the end-end delay as well as queuing metrics like peak queue size, average queue length, in queue average time, and droppe of whole packets. Regrading throughput, the SP algorithm has a greater throughput than WF, RR, and WRR by 4.5%, 2.4%, and 1.42%, but WRR has outperformed others regarding the end-end delay. Moreover, WRR represents the best scheduling algorithm regarding both peak queue size since its greater than RP, WF, and WRR by 10.13%, 9.6%, and 5.32%, in order, and average output queue length in contrast, WRR worsts more time in queuing but it is the best in preventing the packets from dropping.

【 授权许可】

CC BY