Survival is similar after standard treatment and chest compression only in out-of-hospital bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Article

关键词: TO-MOUTH RESUSCITATION;    CARDIAC LIFE-SUPPORT;    VENTRICULAR-FIBRILLATION;    ARREST;    SUDDEN;    CPR;   

DOI  :  10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.710194

来源: SCIE

【 摘 要 】

Background - We sought to compare the 1-month survival rates among patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest who had been given bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in relation to whether they had received standard CPR with chest compression plus mouth-to-mouth ventilation or chest compression only. Methods and Results - All patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest who received bystander CPR and who were reported to the Swedish Cardiac Arrest Register between 1990 and 2005 were included. Crew-witnessed cases were excluded. Among 11 275 patients, 73% (n = 8209) received standard CPR, and 10% (n = 1145) received chest compression only. There was no significant difference in 1-month survival between patients who received standard CPR (1-month survival = 7.2%) and those who received chest compression only (1-month survival = 6.7%). Conclusions - Among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest who received bystander CPR, there was no significant difference in 1-month survival between a standard CPR program with chest compression plus mouth-to-mouth ventilation and a simplified version of CPR with chest compression only.

【 授权许可】

Free