期刊论文详细信息
EvoDevo
The role of non-additive gene action on gene expression variation in plant domestication
Research
Angélica Cibrián-Jaramillo1  Erik Díaz-Valenzuela1  Daniel Hernández-Ríos2 
[1] National Laboratory for Genomics of Biodiversity (UGA-Langebio), CINVESTAV, Irapuato, Guanajuato, Mexico;National Laboratory for Genomics of Biodiversity (UGA-Langebio), CINVESTAV, Irapuato, Guanajuato, Mexico;Monterrey Institute of Technology and Higher Education, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico;
关键词: Plant domestication;    Transcript abundance;    F1 hybrids;    Gene action;    Gene regulatory networks;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s13227-022-00206-4
 received in 2022-03-24, accepted in 2022-12-05,  发布年份 2022
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundPlant domestication is a remarkable example of rapid phenotypic transformation of polygenic traits, such as organ size. Evidence from a handful of study cases suggests this transformation is due to gene regulatory changes that result in non-additive phenotypes. Employing data from published genetic crosses, we estimated the role of non-additive gene action in the modulation of transcriptional landscapes in three domesticated plants: maize, sunflower, and chili pepper. Using A. thaliana, we assessed the correlation between gene regulatory network (GRN) connectivity properties, transcript abundance variation, and gene action. Finally, we investigated the propagation of non-additive gene action in GRNs.ResultsWe compared crosses between domesticated plants and their wild relatives to a set of control crosses that included a pair of subspecies evolving under natural selection and a set of inbred lines evolving under domestication. We found abundance differences on a higher portion of transcripts in crosses between domesticated-wild plants relative to the control crosses. These transcripts showed non-additive gene action more often in crosses of domesticated-wild plants than in our control crosses. This pattern was strong for genes associated with cell cycle and cell fate determination, which control organ size. We found weak but significant negative correlations between the number of targets of trans-acting genes (Out-degree) and both the magnitude of transcript abundance difference a well as the absolute degree of dominance. Likewise, we found that the number of regulators that control a gene’s expression (In-degree) is weakly but negatively correlated with the magnitude of transcript abundance differences. We observed that dominant-recessive gene action is highly propagable through GRNs. Finally, we found that transgressive gene action is driven by trans-acting regulators showing additive gene action.ConclusionsOur study highlights the role of non-additive gene action on modulating domestication-related traits, such as organ size via regulatory divergence. We propose that GRNs are shaped by regulatory changes at genes with modest connectivity, which reduces the effects of antagonistic pleiotropy. Finally, we provide empirical evidence of the propagation of non-additive gene action in GRNs, which suggests a transcriptional epistatic model for the control of polygenic traits, such as organ size.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2023

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202305154874131ZK.pdf 3564KB PDF download
Fig. 1 37KB Image download
13690_2023_1046_Article_IEq6.gif 1KB Image download
Fig. 2 433KB Image download
MediaObjects/13227_2022_206_MOESM1_ESM.docx 567KB Other download
【 图 表 】

Fig. 2

13690_2023_1046_Article_IEq6.gif

Fig. 1

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  • [54]
  • [55]
  • [56]
  • [57]
  • [58]
  • [59]
  • [60]
  • [61]
  • [62]
  • [63]
  • [64]
  • [65]
  • [66]
  • [67]
  • [68]
  • [69]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:64次 浏览次数:2次