期刊论文详细信息
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
Benefit-risk assessment of traditional Chinese medicine preparations of sinomenine using multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Research
Huilian Huang1  Zhitao Feng2  Xiaolan Shen3  Huirong Qin3  Gao Xiang3  Xiaoqiang Hou4  Min Gao5 
[1]Affiliated Renhe Hospital of China Three Gorges University, 443001, Yichang, Hubei, China
[2]Institute of Rheumatology, the First College of Clinical Medical Sciences, China Three Gorges University, 443003, Yichang, Hubei, China
[3]Third-Grade Pharmacological Laboratory On Chinese Medicine Approved By State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Medical College of China Three Gorges University, 443002, Yichang, Hubei, China
[4]The First College of Clinical Medical Sciences, China Three Gorges University, 443003, Yichang, Hubei, China
[5]The First College of Clinical Medical Sciences, China Three Gorges University, 443003, Yichang, Hubei, China
[6]Institute of Rheumatology, the First College of Clinical Medical Sciences, China Three Gorges University, 443003, Yichang, Hubei, China
[7]Yichuan Community Health Service Center, 200065, Shanghai, China
关键词: Sinomenine;    Traditional Chinese medicine;    Rheumatoid arthritis;    Benefit-risk assessment;    Multicriteria decision analysis;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12906-023-03864-6
 received in 2022-08-18, accepted in 2023-01-27,  发布年份 2023
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】
ObjectiveA multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) model was used to evaluate the benefits and risks of traditional Chinese medicine preparations of sinomenine alone or in combination with conventional drugs in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to provide a basis for the rational clinical application of sinomenine.MethodsA study search was performed using six major databases, and Review Manager 5.3 was used for data analysis. Then, an MCDA model evaluation system was established for the treatment of RA with sinomenine preparations, and the benefit values, risk values, and total benefit-risk values of sinomenine preparations alone or in combination with conventional drugs were calculated using Hiview 3.2 software. Finally, Monte Carlo simulations were performed using Crystal Ball embedded in Excel software to calculate the 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), and the probability of the differences between the 2 drug regimens was determined to optimize the evaluation results.ResultsForty-four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Quantitative assessment of the MCDA model showed that the sinomenine preparation alone offered less benefits than when combined with conventional drugs with a benefit difference of 20 (95% CI 3.06, 35.71). However, the risk of the combination was significantly lower with a risk difference of 13(95% CI -10.26, 27.52). The total value of the benefit-risk of sinomenine alone and in combination with conventional drugs was 46 and 53 at 60% and 40% of the benefit-risk ratio of the two dosing regimens, respectively, with a difference of 7 (95% CI -4.26, 22.12). The probability that the comprehensive score of the combined regimen is greater than that of sinomenine alone is 90.1%, and the evaluation was steady.ConclusionThe benefit-risk of the combined application regimen of sinomenine is greater than that of sinomenine alone.
【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2023

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202305154151241ZK.pdf 1552KB PDF download
Fig. 2 112KB Image download
Fig. 4 532KB Image download
Fig. 4 810KB Image download
Fig. 5 198KB Image download
12302_2023_718_Article_IEq70.gif 1KB Image download
Fig. 1 194KB Image download
Fig. 6 2031KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Fig. 6

Fig. 1

12302_2023_718_Article_IEq70.gif

Fig. 5

Fig. 4

Fig. 4

Fig. 2

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  • [54]
  • [55]
  • [56]
  • [57]
  • [58]
  • [59]
  • [60]
  • [61]
  • [62]
  • [63]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:1次 浏览次数:1次