期刊论文详细信息
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Additively manufactured controlled porous orthopedic joint replacement designs to reduce bone stress shielding: a systematic review
Systematic Review
Hans A. Gray1  Dale L. Robinson1  Yihang Yu1  Peter V. S. Lee1  Sarah Safavi1  David C. Ackland1 
[1] Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Melbourne, 3010, Parkville, VIC, Australia;
关键词: 3D printing;    Lattice structure;    Aseptic loosening;    Joint prosthesis;    Orthopedic implant;    Osseointegration;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s13018-022-03492-9
 received in 2022-11-22, accepted in 2022-12-30,  发布年份 2022
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundTotal joint replacements are an established treatment for patients suffering from reduced mobility and pain due to severe joint damage. Aseptic loosening due to stress shielding is currently one of the main reasons for revision surgery. As this phenomenon is related to a mismatch in mechanical properties between implant and bone, stiffness reduction of implants has been of major interest in new implant designs. Facilitated by modern additive manufacturing technologies, the introduction of porosity into implant materials has been shown to enable significant stiffness reduction; however, whether these devices mitigate stress-shielding associated complications or device failure remains poorly understood.MethodsIn this systematic review, a broad literature search was conducted in six databases (Scopus, Web of Science, Medline, Embase, Compendex, and Inspec) aiming to identify current design approaches to target stress shielding through controlled porous structures. The search keywords included ‘lattice,’ ‘implant,’ ‘additive manufacturing,’ and ‘stress shielding.’ResultsAfter the screening of 2530 articles, a total of 46 studies were included in this review. Studies focusing on hip, knee, and shoulder replacements were found. Three porous design strategies were identified, specifically uniform, graded, and optimized designs. The latter included personalized design approaches targeting stress shielding based on patient-specific data. All studies reported a reduction of stress shielding achieved by the presented design.ConclusionNot all studies used quantitative measures to describe the improvements, and the main stress shielding measures chosen varied between studies. However, due to the nature of the optimization approaches, optimized designs were found to be the most promising. Besides the stiffness reduction, other factors such as mechanical strength can be considered in the design on a patient-specific level. While it was found that controlled porous designs are overall promising to reduce stress shielding, further research and clinical evidence are needed to determine the most superior design approach for total joint replacement implants.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2023

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202305116420808ZK.pdf 2075KB PDF download
Fig. 2 682KB Image download
41116_2022_35_Article_IEq175.gif 1KB Image download
41116_2022_35_Article_IEq178.gif 1KB Image download
41116_2022_35_Article_IEq179.gif 1KB Image download
Fig. 4 201KB Image download
41116_2022_35_Article_IEq180.gif 1KB Image download
41116_2022_35_Article_IEq182.gif 1KB Image download
41116_2022_35_Article_IEq184.gif 1KB Image download
【 图 表 】

41116_2022_35_Article_IEq184.gif

41116_2022_35_Article_IEq182.gif

41116_2022_35_Article_IEq180.gif

Fig. 4

41116_2022_35_Article_IEq179.gif

41116_2022_35_Article_IEq178.gif

41116_2022_35_Article_IEq175.gif

Fig. 2

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  • [54]
  • [55]
  • [56]
  • [57]
  • [58]
  • [59]
  • [60]
  • [61]
  • [62]
  • [63]
  • [64]
  • [65]
  • [66]
  • [67]
  • [68]
  • [69]
  • [70]
  • [71]
  • [72]
  • [73]
  • [74]
  • [75]
  • [76]
  • [77]
  • [78]
  • [79]
  • [80]
  • [81]
  • [82]
  • [83]
  • [84]
  • [85]
  • [86]
  • [87]
  • [88]
  • [89]
  • [90]
  • [91]
  • [92]
  • [93]
  • [94]
  • [95]
  • [96]
  • [97]
  • [98]
  • [99]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:7次 浏览次数:3次