期刊论文详细信息
Environmental Microbiome
Habitat type and host grazing regimen influence the soil microbial diversity and communities within potential biting midge larval habitats
Research
Travis Davis1  Dana Nayduch1  Bethany L. McGregor1  Saraswoti Neupane2 
[1] Arthropod-Borne Animal Diseases Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Center for Grain and Animal Health Research, 66502, Manhattan, KS, USA;Department of Entomology, Kansas State University, 66506, Manhattan, KS, USA;
关键词: Potential midge larval habitat;    Soil;    rRNA gene;    Bacteria;    Protists;    Fungi;    Metazoa community;    Diversity;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s40793-022-00456-8
 received in 2022-09-13, accepted in 2022-12-14,  发布年份 2022
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundBiting midges (Culicoides spp.) are important vectors of diverse microbes such as viruses, protozoa, and nematodes that cause diseases in wild and domestic animals. However, little is known about the role of microbial communities in midge larval habitat utilization in the wild. In this study, we characterized microbial communities (bacterial, protistan, fungal and metazoan) in soils from disturbed (bison and cattle grazed) and undisturbed (non-grazed) pond and spring potential midge larval habitats. We evaluated the influence of habitat and grazing disturbance and their interaction on microbial communities, diversity, presence of midges, and soil properties.ResultsBacterial, protistan, fungal and metazoan community compositions were significantly influenced by habitat and grazing type. Irrespective of habitat and grazing type, soil communities were dominated by phyla Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Chloroflexi, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria (Bacteria); Apicomplexa, Cercozoa, Ciliophora, Ochrophyta (Protists); Chytridiomycota, Cryptomycota (Fungi) and Nematoda, Arthropoda (Metazoa). The relative abundance of Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Chloroflexi, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Verrucomicrobia (Bacteria); Apicomplexa, Lobosa (Protists); Ascomycota, Blastomycotina, Cryptomycota (Fungi); and Platyhelminthes (Metazoa) were significantly affected by grazing type. Of note, midge prevalence was higher in grazed sites (67–100%) than non-grazed (25%). Presence of midges in the soil was negatively correlated with bacterial, protistan, fungal and metazoan beta diversities and metazoan species richness but positively correlated with protistan and fungal species richness. Moreover, total carbon (TC), nitrogen (TN) and organic matter (OM) were negatively correlated with the presence of midges and relative abundances of unclassified Solirubrobacterales (Bacteria) and Chlamydomonadales (Protists) but positively with Proteobacteria and unclassified Burkholderiales (Bacteria).ConclusionsHabitat and grazing type shaped the soil bacterial, protistan, fungal and metazoan communities, their compositions and diversities, as well as presence of midges. Soil properties (TN, TC, OM) also influenced soil microbial communities, diversities and the presence of midges. Prevalence of midges mainly in grazed sites indicates that midges prefer to breed and shelter in a habitat with abundant hosts, probably due to greater accessibility of food (blood meals). These results provide a first glimpse into the microbial communities, soil properties and prevalence of midges in suspected midge larval habitats at a protected natural prairie site.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2022

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202305113021595ZK.pdf 1313KB PDF download
MediaObjects/12888_2023_4564_MOESM1_ESM.docx 18KB Other download
41116_2022_35_Article_IEq585.gif 1KB Image download
41116_2022_35_Article_IEq589.gif 1KB Image download
41116_2022_35_Article_IEq593.gif 1KB Image download
41116_2022_35_Article_IEq597.gif 1KB Image download
41116_2022_35_Article_IEq621.gif 1KB Image download
Fig. 2 313KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Fig. 2

41116_2022_35_Article_IEq621.gif

41116_2022_35_Article_IEq597.gif

41116_2022_35_Article_IEq593.gif

41116_2022_35_Article_IEq589.gif

41116_2022_35_Article_IEq585.gif

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  • [54]
  • [55]
  • [56]
  • [57]
  • [58]
  • [59]
  • [60]
  • [61]
  • [62]
  • [63]
  • [64]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:8次 浏览次数:2次