Impact assessment of the medical practice assisting (MPA) program in general practice in the hunter New England and central coast regions of Australia

Human Resources for Health

Research

Shara Close¹  Rod Ling²  Mary Sheffi De Silva²  Shanthi Ann Ramanathan²  Andrew Searles²  Alison Tattersall³  Nicola Ingold³ 

[1] Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, Australia;Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, Australia;University of Newcastle College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, Newcastle, Australia;Hunter New England Central Coast Primary Health Network, Newcastle, Australia;

关键词: Impact assessment;    Rural health workforce;    Medical practice assisting;    Workforce retention;    Regional;    Remote;    Education pathways;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12960-022-00781-6

 received in 2022-05-06, accepted in 2022-11-10,  发布年份 2022

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundA regional Australian Primary Health Network (PHN) has been subsidising administrative staff from local general practices to undertake the Medical Practice Assisting (MPA) course as part of its MPA Program. The MPA Program aimed to upskill administrative staff to undertake clinical tasks and fill in for busy or absent Practice Nurses (PNs), freeing up PNs to increase revenue-generating activity, avoiding casual replacement staff wages, and increasing patient throughput. An impact assessment was undertaken to evaluate the impact and estimate the economic costs of the MPA program to the PHN, general practices, and students to inform future uptake of the intervention.MethodsThe Framework to Assess the Impact of Translational Health Research (FAIT) was utilised. Originally designed to assess the impact of health research, this was its first application to a health services project. FAIT combines three validated methods of impact assessment—Payback, economic analysis and narratives underpinned by a program logic model. Quantified metrics describe the impacts of the program within various “domains of benefit”, the economic model costs the intervention and monetises potential consequences, and the narrative tells the story of the MPA Program and the difference it has made. Data were collected via online surveys from general practitioners (GPs), PNs, practice managers; MPA graduates and PHN staff were interviewed by phone and on Zoom.ResultsFAIT was effective in evidencing the impacts and economic viability of the MPA Program. GPs and PNs reported greater work satisfaction, PNs reported less stress and reduced workloads and MPA graduates reported higher job satisfaction and greater confidence performing a range of clinical skills. MPA Program economic costs for general practices during candidature, and 12 month post-graduation was estimated at $69,756. With effective re-integration planning, this investment was recoverable within 12 months through increased revenue for practices. Graduates paid appropriately for their new skills also recouped their investment within 24 months.ConclusionUtilisation of MPA graduates varied substantially between practices and COVID-19 impacted on their utilisation. More strategic reintegration of the MPA graduate back into the practice to most effectively utilise their new skillset could optimise potential benefits realised by participating practices.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2022

【 图 表 】

41408_2022_764_Article_IEq19.gif

Fig. 1

41408_2022_764_Article_IEq17.gif

41408_2022_764_Article_IEq12.gif

41408_2022_764_Article_IEq10.gif

40249_2022_1045_Article_IEq15.gif