The effectiveness of an aged care specific leadership and management program on workforce, work environment, and care quality outcomes: design of a cluster randomised controlled trial

Implementation Science

Hal Kendig¹  Michelle Cunich⁵  Lynn Chenoweth²  Judy M Simpson⁴  Yun-Hee Jeon³ 

[1] Centre for Research in Ageing, Health and Wellbeing, Research School of Population Health, the Australian National University, Bld 62A, ANU, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia;Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Randwick NSW 2031, Australia;Sydney Nursing School, The University of Sydney, 88 Mallett Street, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia;School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, A27 Edward Ford Building, Camperdown NSW 2006, Australia;NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, The University of Sydney, Camperdown NSW 2006, Australia

关键词: Workforce retention;    Quality and safety;    Work environment;    Management;    Leadership;    Aged care;    Cluster randomised controlled trial;   

Others  :  810935
DOI  :  10.1186/1748-5908-8-126

 received in 2013-09-05, accepted in 2013-10-24,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

A plethora of observational evidence exists concerning the impact of management and leadership on workforce, work environment, and care quality. Yet, no randomised controlled trial has been conducted to test the effectiveness of leadership and management interventions in aged care. An innovative aged care clinical leadership program (Clinical Leadership in Aged Care − CLiAC) was developed to improve managers’ leadership capacities to support the delivery of quality care in Australia. This paper describes the study design of the cluster randomised controlled trial testing the effectiveness of the program.

Methods

Twenty-four residential and community aged care sites were recruited as managers at each site agreed in writing to participate in the study and ensure that leaders allocated to the control arm would not be offered the intervention program. Sites undergoing major managerial or structural changes were excluded. The 24 sites were randomly allocated to receive the CLiAC program (intervention) or usual care (control), stratified by type (residential vs. community, six each for each arm). Treatment allocation was masked to assessors and staff of all participating sites. The objective is to establish the effectiveness of the CLiAC program in improving work environment, workforce retention, as well as care safety and quality, when compared to usual care. The primary outcomes are measures of work environment, care quality and safety, and staff turnover rates. Secondary outcomes include manager leadership capacity, staff absenteeism, intention to leave, stress levels, and job satisfaction. Differences between intervention and control groups will be analysed by researchers blinded to treatment allocation using linear regression of individual results adjusted for stratification and clustering by site (primary analysis), and additionally for baseline values and potential confounders (secondary analysis). Outcomes measured at the site level will be compared by cluster-level analysis. The overall costs and benefits of the program will also be assessed.

Discussion

The outcomes of the trial have the potential to inform actions to enhance leadership and management capabilities of the aged care workforce, address pressing issues about workforce shortages, and increase the quality of aged care services.

Trial registration

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12611001070921)

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Jeon et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Australian Institute of Health and Welfare: Older Australia at a glance. Canberra: AIHW; 2007. 4th edition Cat no AGE 52
• [2]Australian Institute of Health and Welfare: Residential Aged Care in Australia 2010–11: A Statistical Overview. Canberra: AIHW; 2012. [Aged Care Statistics Series no 36 Cat no AGE 68]
• [3]Australian Institute of Health and Welfare: Aged Care Packages in the Community 2010–11: A Statistical Overview. Canberra: AIHW; 2012. [Aged Care Statistics Series no 37 Cat no AGE 69]
• [4]Commission P: Trends in Aged Care Services: Some Implications. Canberra: Commission Research Paper; 2008.
• [5]Commission P: Caring for Older Australians: Final Inquiry Report. Canberra: Commission Research Paper; 2011.
• [6]Hegney D, Eley R, Plank A, Buikstra E, Parker V: Workplace violence in queensland, australia: the results of a comparative study. Int J Nurs Pract 2006, 12(4):220-231.
• [7]Chenoweth L, Merlyn T, Jeon Y-H: Waiting for nurse godot. What factors attract and retain nurses in aged and dementia care: a systematic literature review. Sydney, Australia: Primary Dementia Collaborative Research Centre; 2008.
• [8]Pearson A, Nay R, Koch S, Rosewarne R, Ward C, Andrews C, O’Connor M, Hanna E, Lucas H, Lewis M, et al.: Recruitment and Retention of Nurses in Residential Aged Care, Final Report. 2002. RETRIEVED FROM http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/650f3eec0dfb990fca25692100069854/7fe430ca6ffef273ca257bf00020a9ac/$FILE/recruit.pd webcite
• [9]Martin B, King D: Who carers for older Australians?: A picture of the residential and community based aged care workforce 2007. Barton ACT: National Institute of Labour Studies, Flinders University; Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing; 2008.
• [10]Chenoweth L, Jeon Y-H, Merlyn T, Brodaty H: A systematic review of what factors attract and retain nurses in aged and dementia care. J Clin Nurs 2010, 19(1–2):156-167.
• [11]Jeon Y, Merlyn T, Sansoni E, Glasgow N: Final report: optimising the residential aged care workforce: leadership & management study. Canberra: Australian Primary Health Care Research Institute; 2008.
• [12]Schaefer JA, Moos RH: Work stressors in health care: context and outcomes. Am J Community Appl Soc Psychol 1993, 3(4):235-242.
• [13]Meyer J: Keeping the Workforce fit for Purpose. In My Home Life: Quality of Life in Care Homes - A Review of the Literature. Edited by Meyer J. London: Help the Aged; 2007:124-141.
• [14]Clegg A: Occupational stress in nursing: a review of the literature. J Nurs Manag 2001, 9(2):101-106.
• [15]Doran D, McCutcheon A, Evans M, MacMillan K, Hall L, Pringle D, Smith S, Valente A: Impact of the Manager’s Span of Control on Leadership and Performance. Ottowa: Canadian Health Services Research Foundation; 2004.
• [16]Gagnon S, Rithchie J, Lynch A, Drouin S, Cass V, Rinfret N, Rouleau C, Valois M: Job Satisfaction and Retention of Nursing Staff: The Impact of Nurse Management Leadership. Canadian Health Services Research Foundation: Toronto, Ontario; 2006.
• [17]Michie S, West MA: Managing people and performance: an evidence based framework applied to health service organizations. Intern J Manage Rev 2004, 5–6(2):91-111.
• [18]Wong CA, Cummings GG: The relationship between nursing leadership and patient outcomes: a systematic review. J Nurs Manag 2007, 15(5):508-521.
• [19]Konetzka RT, Stearns SC, Park J: The staffing-outcomes relationship in nursing homes. Health Serv Res 2008, 43(3):1025-1042.
• [20]Miller L, Broughton A, Tamkin P, Reilly P, Regan J: Human resources, organisational development and workforce development in the NHS: a review of recent research. Brighton: Institute for Employment Studies; 2007.
• [21]Page A: Keeping patients safe: transforming the work environment of nurses. Washington D.C: National Academies Press; 2004.
• [22]Clinical Excellence Commission: Evaluation of the Clinical Excellence Commission Clinical Leadership Program. Sydney: CEC; 2009.
• [23]Jeon YH, Merlyn T, Chenoweth L: Leadership and management in the aged care sector: a narrative synthesis. Australas J Ageing 2010, 29(2):54-60.
• [24]Jeon Y-H, Glasgow NJ, Merlyn T, Sansoni E: Policy options to improve leadership of middle managers in the Australian residential aged care setting: a narrative synthesis. BMC Health Serv Res 2010, 10(1):190. BioMed Central Full Text
• [25]Campbell M, Elbourne D, Altman D: The CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ 2004, 328(7441):702-708.
• [26]Moos RH: Work Environment Scale Manual: Developmental Applications Research. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.; 1994.
• [27]Cox H, Puffer S, Morton V, Cooper C, Hodson J, Masud T, Oliver D, Preedy D, Selby P, Stone M, et al.: Educating nursing home staff on fracture prevention: a cluster randomised trial. Age and ageing 2008, 37(2):167-172.
• [28]Hayes R, Moulton L: Cluster Randomised Trials. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2009.
• [29]Lintern T, Woods B: Approaches to dementia questionnaire. Bangor, UK: University of Wales; 1996.
• [30]Edvardsson D, Fetherstonhaugh D, Nay R, Gibson S: Development and initial testing of the person-centered care assessment tool (P-CAT). Int Psychogeriatr 2010, 22(01):101-108.
• [31]Nancarrow S, Moran A, Borthwick A, Buchan J: The Impact of Workforce Flexibility on the Costs and Outcomes of Older peoples’ Services: A Policy and Literature Review. University of Sheffield; 2006. [Sheffield School of Health and Related Research]
• [32]Bass BM, Avolio BJ: Transformational Leadership Development: Manual for the MultifactorLeadership Questionnaire. Palo Alto: CA: Consulting Psychologist Press; 1993.
• [33]Williams S: Evaluation of the Leadership at the Point of Care Programme: Final Evaluation Report. Oxfordshire: Henley Management College; 2005.
• [34]Wilson J, Koch S, Thomas S, Nay R, Koch E, Fox A, Garratt S: Public sector residential aged care quality of care performance indicator project report. 2004. RETRIEVED FROM http://www.health.vic.gov.au/agedcare/downloads/public_sector webcite
• [35]Gilmartin MJ, D’Aunno TA: Leadership research in healthcare: a review and roadmap. Acad ManageAnnals 2007, 1(1):387-438.
• [36]Buchanan D, Caldwell R, Meyer J, Storey J, Wainwright C: Leadership transmission: a muddled metaphor? J Health Organ Manag 2007, 21(3):246-258.
• [37]Hartley J, Hinksman B: Leadership Development: A Systematic Review of the Literature. London: NHS Leadership Centre; 2003.
• [38]DeCicco J, Laschinger H, Kerr M: Perceptions of empowerment and respect: effect on Nurses’ organizational commitment in nursing homes. J Gerontol Nurs 2006, 32(5):49.
• [39]Ellis J, Priest A, MacPhee M, McCutcheon AS, on behalf of CHSRF and partners: Staffing For Safety: A Synthesis of the Evidence on Nurse Staffing and Patient Safety. Canadian Health Services Research Foundation; 2006. RETRIEVED FROM http://www.cfhi-fcass.ca/Migrated/PDF/ResearchReports/CommissionedResearch/staffing_for_safety_policy_synth_e.pdf webcite
• [40]Scott L, Caress A-L: Shared governance and shared leadership: meeting the challenges of implementation. J Nurs Manag 2005, 13(1):4-12.
• [41]Doherty C, Hope W: Shared governance–nurses making a difference. J Nurs Manag 2000, 8(2):77-81.
• [42]Commonwealth of Australia: Living Longer. Living Better - Aged Care Reform Package. Canberra: Department of Health and Ageing; 2012.