期刊论文详细信息
BMC Health Services Research
How a point-of-care dashboard facilitates co-production of health care and health for and with individuals with psychotic disorders: a mixed-methods case study
Research
Christopher Holmberg1  Andreas Gremyr2  Johan Thor3  Ann-Christine Andersson4  Boel Andersson Gäre5  Ulf Malm6 
[1] Department of Psychotic Disorders, Sahlgrenska University, Hospital, Sahlgrenska Universitetssjukhuset Psykiatri Psykos, Göteborgsvägen 31, 431 80, Mölndal, Sweden;Institute of Health and Care Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Arvid Wallgrens Backe, Box 457, 405 30, Göteborg, Sweden;Department of Psychotic Disorders, Sahlgrenska University, Hospital, Sahlgrenska Universitetssjukhuset Psykiatri Psykos, Göteborgsvägen 31, 431 80, Mölndal, Sweden;Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Barnarpsgatan 39, 55111, Jönköping, Sweden;Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Barnarpsgatan 39, 55111, Jönköping, Sweden;Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Barnarpsgatan 39, 55111, Jönköping, Sweden;Department of Care Science, Malmö University, Nordenskiöldsgatan 1, 21119, Malmö, Sweden;Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Barnarpsgatan 39, 55111, Jönköping, Sweden;Futurum Academy for Health and Care, Region Jönköping County, Jönköping, Sweden;Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Box 400, 40530, Göteborg, Sweden;
关键词: Coproduction;    Learning health systems;    Schizophrenia;    Psychosis;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12913-022-08992-2
 received in 2022-04-19, accepted in 2022-12-20,  发布年份 2022
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundIndividuals with psychotic disorders experience widespread treatment failures and risk early death. Sweden’s largest department specializing in psychotic disorders sought to improve patients’ health by developing a point-of-care dashboard to support joint planning and co-production of care. The dashboard was tested for 18 months and included more than 400 patients at two outpatient clinics.MethodsThis study evaluates the dashboard by addressing two questions:Can differences in health-related outcome measures be attributed to the use of the dashboard?How did the case managers experience the accessibility, use, and usefulness of the dashboard for co-producing care with individuals with psychotic disorders?This mixed-method case study used both Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROM) and data from a focus group interview with case managers. Data collection and analysis were framed by the Clinical Adoption Meta Model (CAMM) phases: i) accessibility, ii) system use, iii) behavior, and iv) clinical outcomes. The PROM used was the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0), which assesses functional impairment and disability. Patients at clinics using the dashboard were matched with patients at clinics not using the dashboard. PROM data were compared using non-parametric statistics due to skewness in distribution. The focus group included five case managers who had experience using the dashboard with patients.ResultsCompared to patients from clinics that did not use the dashboard, patients from clinics that did use the dashboard improved significantly overall (p = 0.045) and in the domain self-care (p = 0.041). Focus group participants reported that the dashboard supported data feedback-informed care and a proactive stance related to changes in patients’ health. The dashboard helped users identify critical changes and enabled joint planning and evaluation.ConclusionDashboard use was related to better patient health (WHODAS scores) when compared with matched patients from clinics that did not use the dashboard. In addition, case managers had a positive experience using the dashboard. Dashboard use might have lowered the risk for missing critical changes in patients’ health while increasing the ability to proactively address needs. Future studies should investigate how to enhance patient co-production through use of supportive technologies.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2022

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202305063285457ZK.pdf 1488KB PDF download
Fig. 1 104KB Image download
12888_2022_4322_Article_IEq2.gif 1KB Image download
12888_2022_4322_Article_IEq3.gif 1KB Image download
12888_2022_4322_Article_IEq5.gif 1KB Image download
12888_2022_4322_Article_IEq8.gif 1KB Image download
12888_2022_4322_Article_IEq9.gif 1KB Image download
【 图 表 】

12888_2022_4322_Article_IEq9.gif

12888_2022_4322_Article_IEq8.gif

12888_2022_4322_Article_IEq5.gif

12888_2022_4322_Article_IEq3.gif

12888_2022_4322_Article_IEq2.gif

Fig. 1

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:10次 浏览次数:0次