期刊论文详细信息
BMC Medical Education
Synchronous online lecturing or blended flipped classroom with jigsaw: an educational intervention during the Covid-19 pandemic
Research
Zinat Mohebbi1  Manoosh Mehrabi2  Alireza Mortezaei-Haftador3 
[1] Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran;Department of e-Learning in Medical Sciences, Virtual School (Comprehensive Center of Excellence for Advanced Electronic Learning in Medical Sciences), Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran;School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran;
关键词: Online systems;    Communication skills;    Critical thinking;    Nursing students;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12909-022-03915-5
 received in 2022-04-23, accepted in 2022-11-22,  发布年份 2022
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundThe Covid-19 pandemic has changed the education system throughout the world. This study aimed to compare synchronous online lecturing with blended flipped classroom plus jigsaw in terms of their effects on the students’ learning, communication skills and critical thinking disposition.MethodsThis is an educational intervention conducted at the Nursing and Midwifery School of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. Two incoming students of nursing and midwifery were selected by complete enumeration. Then synchronous online lecturing was given to one group (n = 40) and blended flipped classroom and jigsaw to the other (n = 44). After that, given the prevailing conditions, both methods were performed fully online. Then Participants completed an online questionnaire. A researcher-made learning questionnaire, the Interpersonal Communication Skills Questionnaire developed by Fetro, and Ricketts’ Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory were used to assess the study variables.ResultsThe mean learning scores in the blended group were slightly higher but this difference was not significant (P = 0.767). In the blended group, the mean scores of communication skills were significantly higher after the intervention in all the dimensions, except for empathy & intimacy and listening skills. In the online lecture group, there was no significant difference between before and after the intervention. Communication skills (P < 0.001) scored significantly higher in the blended group after the intervention than that in the synchronous online lecturing group in all the dimensions except for empathy & intimacy. In the online lecture group, there was no significant difference in critical thinking disposition between before and after the intervention. In the blended group, the overall score of critical thinking disposition and its dimensions was significantly higher after the intervention (P < 0.001), except for the perfection dimension. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the mean total score of critical thinking disposition and its dimensions before and after the intervention.ConclusionGiven the global circumstances, the blended method was more effective in promoting learning outcomes and communication skills than synchronous online lectures. Furthermore, it seems that this new approach could improve critical thinking.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2022

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202305062382293ZK.pdf 1010KB PDF download
MediaObjects/12974_2022_2679_MOESM1_ESM.docx 2847KB Other download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  • [54]
  • [55]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:3次