Comparison of ozonated water and acidified copper sulphate in prevention of digital dermatitis in dairy cows

Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica

Brief Communication

Dörte Döpfer¹  Timo Soveri²  Minna Kujala-Wirth²  Hertta Pirkkalainen² 

[1] Department of Medical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 53706, Madison, USA;Department of Production Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Paroninkuja 20, 04920, Saarentaus, Finland;

关键词: Copper sulphate;    Dairy cow;    Digital dermatitis;    Hoof bath;    Ozonated water;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s13028-022-00657-8

 received in 2022-08-08, accepted in 2022-12-05,  发布年份 2022

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

Digital dermatitis (DD) is the most significant infectious hoof disorder of cattle in Europe. Hoof baths are one of the most common control methods. Copper sulphate and formalin are commonly used in hoof baths, but their use is problematic in many European countries for health, environmental and safety reasons. Ozonated water and acidified copper sulphate were tested as prevention of DD in a 5-month study. Data were derived from 302 hind feet of Holstein and Estonian Red cows (no. of cows = 151) from a commercial dairy farm in Estonia. Altogether 168 hind feet were included in the acidified copper sulphate group and 134 feet in the ozonated water group. Hoof bathing was carried out three days a week (Mon, Wed, Fri) for two months and then two days a week (Mon, Wed) for three and a half months, in both groups. Ozonated water was sprayed on to the digital skin of hind feet of cows twice a day on treatment days, while the cows were eating. The copper sulphate bath consisted of copper sulphate (2%) mixed with an organic acid compound to acidify and ionize the solution. Cows walked through acidified copper sulphate solution twice a day on treatment days as they were exiting the milking parlor. DD negative and DD positive test results in both groups were compared and statistically tested for differences. The copper sulphate solution was more effective than ozonated water at preventing acute DD lesions. A random maximum likelihood model demonstrated that the odds ratio for DD in the ozonated water group was six times higher compared with DD in the acidified copper sulphate group. Most of the cows that were initially without any DD lesions (M0 + no other severe hoof lesion), remained lesion-free in both groups (copper sulphate group 97% and ozonated water group 88%). Despite trial design deficiencies, the findings indicate that acidified copper sulphate was a more effective solution in preventing DD than ozonated water.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2022

【 图 表 】

Fig. 1