期刊论文详细信息
Indonesian Journal of Environmental Management and Sustainability: IJEMS
Multi-Attribute Utility Theory Decision Analysis for Biodegradable River Debris Composting Treatment in Surakarta City
article
Mega Mutiara Sari1  Takanobu Inoue2  Regil Kentaurus Harryes3  Kuriko Yokota2  Iva Yenis Septiariva4  Sapta Suhardono5  Shigeru Kato2  Suprihanto Notodarmojo6  Aninda Putri Nafisah1  I Wayan Koko Suryawan1 
[1] Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Infrastructure Planning, Universitas Pertamina;Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Toyohashi University of Technology;Faculty of Vocational Studies, Universitas Pertahanan Indonesia;Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Sebelas Maret;Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Sebelas Maret;Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Institut Teknologi Bandung
关键词: Debris;    Composting;    MAUT;    Decision Analysis;   
DOI  :  10.26554/ijems.2022.6.2.59-66
来源: ARTS Publishing Corp
PDF
【 摘 要 】

River waste in Surakarta City primarily consists of biodegradable waste that can be processed by biological processes such ascomposting. However, there are various kinds of composting application techniques. This, of course, must be adapted to theconditions in Surakarta City. This study aims to conduct a decision analysis on debris processing techniques in SurakartaCity using the Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) method. The criteria used are aesthetics, land requirements, ease ofoperation, ease of construction, and investment and operational costs. Alternatives used in composting are bamboo aeratorsystem, hollow brick, and takakura arranges. The final assessment by MAUT showed that waste processing with hollow brick(0.802) had the highest weight and was followed by the bamboo aerator system (0.643). The final score for the takakuramethod is only 0.250, and this is because the weight on costs and land requirements is considerable compared to the othertwo alternatives.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202303290001320ZK.pdf 5082KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:8次 浏览次数:1次