Risk-Adjusted Survival after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Implications for Quality Improvement

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Jason B. O'Neal¹  Curtis A. Anderson²  Jimmy T. Efird²  Linda C. Kindell²  W. Randolph Chitwood²  Alan P. Kypson²  T. Bruce Ferguson²  Stephen W. Davies³  Wesley T. O'Neal⁴ 

[1] Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA;Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina Heart Institute, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27834, USA;Department of General Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville,VA 22908, USA;Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA;

关键词: outcomes;    coronary artery bypass grafting;    CABG;    survival;    mortality;   

DOI  :  10.3390/ijerph110707470

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Mortality represents an important outcome measure following coronary artery bypass grafting. Shorter survival times may reflect poor surgical quality and an increased number of costly postoperative complications. Quality control efforts aimed at increasing survival times may be misleading if not properly adjusted for case-mix severity. This paper demonstrates how to construct and cross-validate efficiency-outcome plots for a specified time (e.g., 6-month and 1-year survival) after coronary artery bypass grafting, accounting for baseline cardiovascular risk factors. The application of this approach to regional centers allows for the localization of risk stratification rather than applying overly broad andnon-specific models to their patient populations.

【 授权许可】

Unknown