I fenomeni con o senza la fenomenologia. Un confronto a più voci

Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia

关键词: Phenomenon;    Intentionality;    Object;    Edmund Husserl;    Paul Natorp;   

DOI  :  10.4453/rifp.2019.0012

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Phenomenology, by its very name, seems to invoke a priority claim on the study of phenomena. Yet a glance at the history of philosophy or, more generally, the sciences, suffices to demonstrate how widely the concept of “phenomena” has been used outside phenomenology. So, what exactly is unique to the phenomenological understanding of phenomena? In order to formulate a possible answer, we reactivate the debate between the Husserl of the Logische Untersuchungen and Paul Natorp, a neo-Kantian philosopher from Marburg. This debate is of interest on two fronts: first, because Natorp’s criticism directly forced Husserl to clarify his views on phenomenology; second, because the debate anticipated some of the most important arguments on naturalizing consciousness in the cognitive sciences.

【 授权许可】

Unknown