Exploring constructs of well-being, happiness and quality of life

PeerJ

Oleg N. Medvedev¹  C. Erik Landhuis² 

[1] School of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand;School of Social Sciences and Public Policy, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand;

关键词: Quality of life;    Well-being;    Happiness;    Measurement;    Life satisfaction;   

DOI  :  10.7717/peerj.4903

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Background Existing definitions of happiness, subjective well-being, and quality of life suggest conceptual overlap between these constructs. This study explored the relationship between these well-being constructs by applying widely used measures with satisfactory psychometric properties. Materials and Methods University students (n = 180) completed widely used well-being measures including the Oxford Happiness Questionnaire (OHQ), the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire, the Satisfaction with Life Scale, and the Positive and Negative Affect Scale. We analyzed the data using correlation, regression, and exploratory factor analysis. Results All included well-being measures demonstrated high loadings on the global well-being construct that explains about 80% of the variance in the OHQ, the psychological domain of Quality of Life and subjective well-being. The results show high positive correlations between happiness, psychological and health domains of quality of life, life satisfaction, and positive affect. Social and environmental domains of quality of life were poor predictors of happiness and subjective well-being after controlling for psychological quality of life. Conclusion Together, these data provide support for a global well-being dimension and interchangeable use of terms happiness, subjective well-being, and psychological quality of life with the current sample and measures. Further investigation with larger heterogeneous samples and other well-being measures is warranted.

【 授权许可】

Unknown