Nutrients | |
Estimation of Energy Intake by a Food Frequency Questionnaire: Calibration and Validation with the Doubly Labeled Water Method in Japanese Older People | |
Chiho Goto1  Hiroyuki Sagayama2  Naoyuki Ebine3  Yasuki Higaki4  Misaka Kimura5  Keiichi Yokoyama5  Tsukasa Yoshida6  Yosuke Yamada6  Kazuko Ishikawa-Takata6  Hinako Nanri6  Daiki Watanabe6  Aya Itoi6  Kyoto-Kameoka Study Group6  Miwa Yamaguchi6  Yuya Watanabe6  | |
[1] Department of Health and Nutrition, Faculty of Health and Human Life, Nagoya Bunri University, Aichi 492-8520, Japan;Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8577, Japan;Faculty of Health and Sports Science, Doshisha University, Kyoto 610-0394, Japan;Faculty of Sports and Health Science, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka 814-0180, Japan;Laboratory of Applied Health Sciences, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan;National Institute of Health and Nutrition, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Tokyo 162-8636, Japan,; | |
关键词: food frequency questionnaire; energy intake; doubly labeled water; total energy expenditure; validity; | |
DOI : 10.3390/nu11071546 | |
来源: DOAJ |
【 摘 要 】
Accurate assessments of a target population’s energy intake (EI) are essential to prevent poor nutritional status. However, self-reported dietary records (DRs) or food frequency questionnaires (FFQs) are not always accurate, thereby requiring validation and calibration studies. This study aimed to validate the EI estimated by a FFQ using the doubly labeled water (DLW) method. Participants were 109 Japanese older adults (50 women and 59 men) aged 65−88 years. The EI was obtained by a DR and 47-item FFQ over 1 year. The total energy expenditure (TEE) was measured by DLW for ~2 weeks. EI was significantly lower than TEE (p < 0.01); ratios of EI assessed by DR and FFQ against TEE were 0.91 ± 0.17 and 0.82 ± 0.22, respectively. TEE was significantly and moderately correlated with the EI estimated by the DR (r = 0.45, p < 0.01) and FFQ (r = 0.37, p < 0.01). Furthermore, the EI correlation coefficients estimated by DR and the FFQ in this study were not significantly different (p = 0.46). The EI/TEE ratio was significantly and negatively correlated with the body mass index (BMI). In conclusion, EI estimated with a DR or FFQ modestly correlated with TEE, and calibrating EI with a developed equation in this study can attenuate the underestimation of EI.
【 授权许可】
Unknown