| Annals of the University of Petrosani: Economics | |
| MAPPING COMPLEX DEBATES: A CASE STUDY ON AUSTHINK RATIONALE | |
| CIPRIAN CUCU1  | |
| [1] "1 Decembrie 1918” University, Alba Iulia, Romania; | |
| 关键词: argumentation; computer systems; learning; | |
| DOI : | |
| 来源: DOAJ | |
【 摘 要 】
Argumentation is considered the most important way humans can deal with conflicting information (Besnard & Hunter, 2008) by finding and organizing justifications for proposed claims. Argumentation is widely used in several domains such as law, politics and management (as decision support). Consequently, for any domain in which a structured argument may be developed, a computer system may be used to aid the process (eg. by storing facts, automatically evaluating arguments or visually representing argument maps). The current paper presents a case study on creating argument visualizations (argument maps) for complex arguments, using the Austhink Rationale software.
【 授权许可】
Unknown