An Evaluation of Energy Storage Cost and Performance Characteristics

Energies

Vladimir Koritarov¹  Boualem Hadjerioua²  Vilayanur Viswanathan³  Patrick Balducci³  Jan Alam³  Kendall Mongird³  Vanshika Fotedar³ 

[1] Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL 60439, USA;Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, USA;Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, USA;

关键词: energy storage;    energy economics;    batteries;    lithium-ion;    pumped storage hydro;    compressed air energy storage;   

DOI  :  10.3390/en13133307

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

The energy storage industry has expanded globally as costs continue to fall and opportunities in consumer, transportation, and grid applications are defined. As the rapid evolution of the industry continues, it has become increasingly important to understand how varying technologies compare in terms of cost and performance. This paper defines and evaluates cost and performance parameters of six battery energy storage technologies (BESS)—lithium-ion batteries, lead-acid batteries, redox flow batteries, sodium-sulfur batteries, sodium-metal halide batteries, and zinc-hybrid cathode batteries—four non-BESS storage systems—pumped storage hydropower, flywheels, compressed air energy storage, and ultracapacitors—and combustion turbines. Cost and performance information was compiled based on an extensive literature review, conversations with vendors and stakeholders, and costs of systems procured at sites across the United States. Detailed cost and performance estimates are presented for 2018 and projected out to 2025. Annualized costs were also calculated for each technology.

【 授权许可】

Unknown