A Spanish Neuropsychological Battery Discriminates Between the Behavioral Variant of Frontotemporal Dementia and Primary Progressive Aphasia in a Colombian Sample

Frontiers in Neurology

Yakeel Quiroz¹  Edmarie Guzmán-Vélez¹  Lina Velilla²  Francisco Lopera²  Margarita Giraldo-Chica²  Jonathan Hernández³ 

[1] Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States;Neuroscience Group of Antioquia, The University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia;Psychology Department, University Institution of Envigado, Envigado, Colombia;

关键词: frontotemporal dementia;    primary progressive aphasia;    behavioral variant;    neuropsychological tests;    discriminant analyses;   

DOI  :  10.3389/fneur.2021.656478

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

The differential diagnosis among the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia FTD (bvFTD) and the linguist one primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is challenging. Presentations of dementia type or variants dominated by personality change or aphasia are frequently misinterpreted as psychiatric illness, stroke, or other conditions. Therefore, it is important to identify cognitive tests that can distinguish the distinct FTD variants to reduce misdiagnosis and best tailor interventions. We aim to examine the discriminative capacity of the most frequently used cognitive tests in their Spanish version for the context of dementia evaluation as well as the qualitative aspects of the neuropsychological performance such as the frequency and type of errors, perseverations, and false positives that can best discriminate between bvFTD and PPA. We also described mood and behavioral profiles of participants with mild to moderate probable bvFTD and PPA. A total of 55 subjects were included in this cross-sectional study: 20 with PPA and 35 with bvFTD. All participants underwent standard dementia screening that included a medical history and physical examination, brain MRI, a semistructured caregiver interview, and neuropsychological testing. We found that bvFTD patients had worse performance in executive function tests, and the PPA presented with the lower performance in language tests and the global score of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). After running the linear discriminant model, we found three functions of cognitive test and subtests combination and three functions made by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) language subtest and performance errors that predicted group belonging. Those functions were more capable to classify bvFTD cases rather than PPA. In conclusion, our study supports that the combination of an individual test of executive function and language, MoCA's subtest, and performance errors as well have good accuracy to discriminate between bvFTD and PPA.

【 授权许可】

Unknown