Comparing the Effectiveness of Exome Capture Probes, Genotyping by Sequencing and Whole-Genome Re-Sequencing for Assessing Genetic Diversity in Natural and Managed Stands of Picea abies

Forests

Helena Eklöf¹  Carolina Bernhardsson²  PärK. Ingvarsson³ 

[1] Department of Ecology and Environmental Science, Umeå Plant Science Centre, Umeå University, SE901 87 Umeå, Sweden;Department of Organismal Biology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, SE752 36 Uppsala, Sweden;Department of Plant Biology, Linnean Centre for Plant Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE750 07 Uppsala, Sweden;

关键词: genetic diversity;    genotyping;    GBS;    Norway spruce;    Picea abies;   

DOI  :  10.3390/f11111185

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Conifer genomes are characterized by their large size and high abundance of repetitive material, making large-scale genotyping in conifers complicated and expensive. One of the consequences of this is that it has been difficult to generate data on genome-wide levels of genetic variation. To date, researchers have mainly employed various complexity reduction techniques to assess genetic variation across the genome in different conifer species. These methods tend to capture variation in a relatively small subset of a typical conifer genome and it is currently not clear how representative such results are. Here we take advantage of data generated in the first large-scale re-sequencing effort in Norway spruce and assess how well two commonly used complexity reduction methods, targeted capture probes and genotyping by sequencing perform in capturing genome-wide variation in Norway spruce. Our results suggest that both methods perform reasonably well for assessing genetic diversity and population structure in Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) H. Karst.). Targeted capture probes were slightly more effective than GBS, likely due to them targeting known genomic regions whereas the GBS data contains a substantially greater fraction of repetitive regions, which sometimes can be problematic for assessing genetic diversity. In conclusion, both methods are useful for genotyping large numbers of samples and they greatly reduce the cost involved with genotyping a species with such a complex genome as Norway spruce.

【 授权许可】

Unknown