Beyond participation: How to achieve the recognition of local communities’ value‐systems in conservation? Some insights from Mexico

People and Nature

Unai Pascual¹  Adriana Carolina Flores‐Díaz²  Peter Rijnaldus Wilhelmus Gerritsen³  Eligio García‐Serrano⁴  Louise Guibrunet⁵  Eduardo García‐Frapolli⁶  Patricia Balvanera⁶  José Antonio Sierra‐Huelsz⁷ 

[1] Basque Center for Climate Change (BC3) Scientific Campus of the University of the Basque Country Leioa Spain;Centro Transdisciplinar Universitario para la SustentabilidadUniversidad Iberoamericana Lomas de Santa Fe Mexico;Departamento de Ecología y Recursos Naturales Centro Universitario de la Costa SurUniversidad de Guadalajara Autlán de Navarro Mexico;Fondo Monarca Zitácuaro Mexico;Instituto de Geografía Universidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoCiudad Universitaria Ciudad de México Mexico;Instituto de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas y SustentabilidadUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México Morelia Mexico;People and Plants International Bristol VT USA;

关键词: conservation;    environmental justice;    epistemology;    forests;    governance;    power;   

DOI  :  10.1002/pan3.10203

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Abstract In this article, we explore why conservation schemes that have positive outcomes through the participation of local communities cannot necessarily be deemed as just. We observe that recognition (understood as inclusion and respect) of local communities’ value‐systems, a key factor towards environmental justice, is not often achieved in conservation governance. We build our argument on the authors’ extensive research on four Mexican forest areas and contrast our insights with the literature on environmental justice and conservation. All four cases are characterised by positive conservation outcomes as well as the inclusion of local communities in conservation governance, and as such are typically considered best‐practice conservation initiatives in Mexico. Yet, in all cases, our engagement with local community members leads us to believe that their value‐systems fail to be recognised in conservation governance. Three main factors appear to hinder recognition: (a) the dominant knowledge‐system underpinning conservation action prevails in legal frameworks; (b) financial resources heavily determine power relations in decision‐making, and (c) a lack of sensitiveness to local cultural norms affects local stakeholders’ capacity to communicate with external actors that design and implement conservation action. We conclude that achieving meaningful recognition of local communities’ value‐systems requires: (a) developing awareness of the structural political and economic factors impacting on decision‐making in conservation, and (b) an epistemological transformation, permeating conservation governance, in which local communities’ value‐systems are considered one of various legitimate knowledge‐systems. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.

【 授权许可】

Unknown